Thread (10 messages) flat view 10 messages, 3 authors, 2016-12-06

Re: i8042 error at booting an Intel Cherry Trail-based device

From: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>
Date: 2016-12-06 06:08:02
Also in: lkml

On December 5, 2016 4:56:05 PM PST, Marcos Paulo de Souza [off-list ref] wrote:
Hi Takashi,

On Fri, Dec 02, 2016 at 11:55:07AM +0100, Takashi Iwai wrote:
quoted
On Thu, 01 Dec 2016 08:19:46 +0100,
Takashi Iwai wrote:
quoted
On Thu, 01 Dec 2016 03:29:23 +0100,
Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
quoted
Hi Takashi,

On Mon, Nov 28, 2016 at 02:56:36PM +0100, Takashi Iwai wrote:
quoted
Hi Dmitry,

I've been testing a small machine with Intel Cherry Trail
chipset, and
quoted
quoted
quoted
quoted
noticed that the kernel spews errors always like:

 i8042: PNP: No PS/2 controller found. Probing ports directly.
 i8042: Can't read CTR while initializing i8042
 i8042: probe of i8042 failed with error -5

Especially the second one ("Can't read CTR...") is annoying
since it's
quoted
quoted
quoted
quoted
in KERN_ERR level and thus appears even booted with quiet boot
option.  Actually this is the only error message appearing at
boot, so
quoted
quoted
quoted
quoted
I'd love to get rid of it.

What is the preferred way to reduce this?  For example, is a
patch
quoted
quoted
quoted
quoted
like below OK to simply change the log level and the error
code?
quoted
quoted
quoted
No, because if controller is actually present this is a hard
failure and
quoted
quoted
quoted
we should be reporting it, not suppressing it.

The issue is that we did not believe PNP data and in this case we
should
quoted
quoted
quoted
have. Unfortunately in old days there was a lot of crap in
PNP/ACPI
quoted
quoted
quoted
tables, but it could be better now. We can try, in addition to
PNP
quoted
quoted
quoted
matching, checking 8042 flag in "Fixed ACPI Description Table
Boot
quoted
quoted
quoted
Architecture Flags" in FADT and if it also shows there is no 8042
then
quoted
quoted
quoted
bail.
That sounds promising.  Indeed FACL.dsl shows like:

[000h 0000   4]                    Signature : "FACP"    [Fixed
ACPI Description Table (FADT)]
quoted
quoted
[004h 0004   4]                 Table Length : 0000010C
....
               Legacy Devices Supported (V2) : 0
            8042 Present on ports 60/64 (V2) : 0

If a test patch gets ready, let me know, I'll give it a try.
FYI, a hack like below seems working.


Takashi

---
diff --git a/drivers/input/serio/i8042-x86ia64io.h
b/drivers/input/serio/i8042-x86ia64io.h
quoted
index 073246c7d163..ed6ab702e4b7 100644
--- a/drivers/input/serio/i8042-x86ia64io.h
+++ b/drivers/input/serio/i8042-x86ia64io.h
@@ -9,6 +9,7 @@
 
 #ifdef CONFIG_X86
 #include <asm/x86_init.h>
+#include <linux/acpi.h>
 #endif
 
 /*
@@ -1055,6 +1056,13 @@ static int __init i8042_pnp_init(void)
 #if defined(__ia64__)
 		return -ENODEV;
 #else
+#ifdef CONFIG_ACPI
+		if (acpi_gbl_FADT.header.revision >= 3 &&
+		    !(acpi_gbl_FADT.boot_flags & ACPI_FADT_8042)) {
+			pr_info("PNP: No PS/2 controller found and disabled in ACPI\n");
+			return -ENODEV;
+		}
+#endif
 		pr_info("PNP: No PS/2 controller found. Probing ports
directly.\n");
quoted
 		return 0;
 #endif
I'm not an expert in any subsystem but, maybe this "hack" could be
added
to default_i8042_detect in arch/x86/kernel/x86_init.c? Currently it is
enabled by default, but different Intel platform like ce4100 and
intel-mid disables it explicit.

I mentioned "hack" because following osdev.org[1] using ACPI is the
correct way to detect if i8042 exists. Pardon me if this not applies in
this situation, or if I missed something.
That is the proper way of detecting i8042 if you trust firmware; historically we do not, and so we want to make sure that PNP data agrees with fadt data.


Thanks.

-- 
Dmitry
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help