Thread (4 messages) 4 messages, 2 authors, 2016-09-14

Re: [PATCH 4/4] hda: thinkpad_helper: Add support for hid-lenovo LED control

flat view

From: Takashi Iwai <hidden>
Date: 2016-09-12 12:38:14
Also in: alsa-devel, linux-sound

On Mon, 12 Sep 2016 12:47:03 +0200,
Dennis Wassenberg wrote:
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
Make the thinkpad_helper able to support not only led control over
acpi with thinkpad_acpi driver but also led control over hid-lenovo.
The hid-lenovo driver adapted the led control api of thinkpad_acpi.

Signed-off-by: Dennis Wassenberg <redacted>
---
 sound/pci/hda/thinkpad_helper.c | 149 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------
 1 file changed, 111 insertions(+), 38 deletions(-)
diff --git a/sound/pci/hda/thinkpad_helper.c b/sound/pci/hda/thinkpad_helper.c
index 62741a7..c24a4a9 100644
--- a/sound/pci/hda/thinkpad_helper.c
+++ b/sound/pci/hda/thinkpad_helper.c
@@ -2,79 +2,152 @@
  * to be included from codec driver
  */
 
-#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_THINKPAD_ACPI)
-
+#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_THINKPAD_ACPI) || IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_HID_LENOVO)
 #include <linux/acpi.h>
+#include <linux/hid-lenovo.h>
 #include <linux/thinkpad_acpi.h>
 
-static int (*led_set_func)(int, bool);
+static int (*led_set_func_tpacpi)(int, bool);
+static int (*led_set_func_hid_lenovo)(int, bool);
 static void (*old_vmaster_hook)(void *, int);
 
 static bool is_thinkpad(struct hda_codec *codec)
 {
+	return (codec->core.subsystem_id >> 16 == 0x17aa);
+}
+
+static bool is_thinkpad_acpi(struct hda_codec *codec)
+{
 	return (codec->core.subsystem_id >> 16 == 0x17aa) &&
 	       (acpi_dev_found("LEN0068") || acpi_dev_found("IBM0068"));
 }
 
-static void update_tpacpi_mute_led(void *private_data, int enabled)
+static void update_thinkpad_mute_led(void *private_data, int enabled)
 {
 	if (old_vmaster_hook)
 		old_vmaster_hook(private_data, enabled);
 
-	if (led_set_func)
-		led_set_func(TPACPI_LED_MUTE, !enabled);
+	if (led_set_func_tpacpi)
+		led_set_func_tpacpi(TPACPI_LED_MUTE, !enabled);
+
+	if (led_set_func_hid_lenovo)
+		led_set_func_hid_lenovo(HID_LENOVO_LED_MUTE, !enabled);
 }
 
-static void update_tpacpi_micmute_led(struct hda_codec *codec,
+
+
+static void update_thinkpad_micmute_led(struct hda_codec *codec,
 				      struct snd_kcontrol *kcontrol,
 				      struct snd_ctl_elem_value *ucontrol)
 {
-	if (!ucontrol || !led_set_func)
+	if (!ucontrol)
 		return;
 	if (strcmp("Capture Switch", ucontrol->id.name) == 0 && ucontrol->id.index == 0) {
 		/* TODO: How do I verify if it's a mono or stereo here? */
 		bool val = ucontrol->value.integer.value[0] || ucontrol->value.integer.value[1];
-		led_set_func(TPACPI_LED_MICMUTE, !val);
+		if (led_set_func_tpacpi)
+			led_set_func_tpacpi(TPACPI_LED_MICMUTE, !val);
+		if (led_set_func_hid_lenovo)
+			led_set_func_hid_lenovo(HID_LENOVO_LED_MICMUTE, !val);
 	}
 }
 
-static void hda_fixup_thinkpad(struct hda_codec *codec,
-				    const struct hda_fixup *fix, int action)
+static int hda_fixup_thinkpad_acpi(struct hda_codec *codec)
 {
 	struct hda_gen_spec *spec = codec->spec;
-	bool removefunc = false;
+	int ret = -ENXIO;
 
-	if (action == HDA_FIXUP_ACT_PROBE) {
-		if (!is_thinkpad(codec))
-			return;
-		if (!led_set_func)
-			led_set_func = symbol_request(tpacpi_led_set);
-		if (!led_set_func) {
-			codec_warn(codec,
-				   "Failed to find thinkpad-acpi symbol tpacpi_led_set\n");
-			return;
-		}
+	if (!is_thinkpad(codec))
+		return -ENODEV;
+	if (!is_thinkpad_acpi(codec))
+		return -ENODEV;
+	if (!led_set_func_tpacpi)
+		led_set_func_tpacpi = symbol_request(tpacpi_led_set);
This would be performed even if CONFIG_THINKPAD_ACPI=n when
CONFIG_HID_LENOVO!=n.  You'd need to have a proper ifdef surrounding
the function.

quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
+	if (!led_set_func_tpacpi) {
+		codec_warn(codec,
+			   "Failed to find thinkpad-acpi symbol tpacpi_led_set\n");
+		return -ENOENT;
+	}
 
-		removefunc = true;
-		if (led_set_func(TPACPI_LED_MUTE, false) >= 0) {
-			old_vmaster_hook = spec->vmaster_mute.hook;
-			spec->vmaster_mute.hook = update_tpacpi_mute_led;
-			removefunc = false;
-		}
-		if (led_set_func(TPACPI_LED_MICMUTE, false) >= 0) {
-			if (spec->num_adc_nids > 1)
-				codec_dbg(codec,
-					  "Skipping micmute LED control due to several ADCs");
-			else {
-				spec->cap_sync_hook = update_tpacpi_micmute_led;
-				removefunc = false;
-			}
+	if (led_set_func_tpacpi(TPACPI_LED_MUTE, false) >= 0) {
+		old_vmaster_hook = spec->vmaster_mute.hook;
+		spec->vmaster_mute.hook = update_thinkpad_mute_led;
+		ret = 0;
+	}
+
+	if (led_set_func_tpacpi(TPACPI_LED_MICMUTE, false) >= 0) {
+		if (spec->num_adc_nids > 1)
+			codec_dbg(codec,
+				  "Skipping micmute LED control due to several ADCs");
+		else {
+			spec->cap_sync_hook = update_thinkpad_micmute_led;
+			ret = 0;
 		}
 	}
 
-	if (led_set_func && (action == HDA_FIXUP_ACT_FREE || removefunc)) {
+	return ret;
+}
+
+static int hda_fixup_thinkpad_hid(struct hda_codec *codec)
+{
+	struct hda_gen_spec *spec = codec->spec;
+	int ret = 0;
+
+	if (!is_thinkpad(codec))
+		return -ENODEV;
+	if (!led_set_func_hid_lenovo)
+		led_set_func_hid_lenovo = symbol_request(hid_lenovo_led_set);
+	if (!led_set_func_hid_lenovo) {
+		codec_warn(codec,
+			   "Failed to find hid-lenovo symbol hid_lenovo_led_set\n");
+		return -ENOENT;
+	}
+
+	if (update_thinkpad_mute_led != spec->vmaster_mute.hook)
+		old_vmaster_hook = spec->vmaster_mute.hook;
+
+	// do not remove hook if setting delay does not work currently because
+	// it is a usb hid devices which is not connected right now
+	// maybe is will be connected later
The comment should be C style.  Try checkpatch.pl once before the
patch submission.

quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
+	led_set_func_hid_lenovo(HID_LENOVO_LED_MUTE, false);
+	spec->vmaster_mute.hook = update_thinkpad_mute_led;
+
+	led_set_func_hid_lenovo(HID_LENOVO_LED_MICMUTE, false);
+	spec->cap_sync_hook = update_thinkpad_micmute_led;
+
+	return ret;
+}
+
+static void hda_fixup_thinkpad(struct hda_codec *codec,
+				    const struct hda_fixup *fix, int action)
+{
+	int ret_fixup_acpi = 0;
+	int ret_fixup_hid = 0;
+	bool remove = 0;
+
+	if (action == HDA_FIXUP_ACT_PROBE) {
+		ret_fixup_acpi = hda_fixup_thinkpad_acpi(codec);
+		ret_fixup_hid = hda_fixup_thinkpad_hid(codec);
Basically these two are exclusive.  So you don't have to process the
latter when the former succeeds.  But...
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
+	}
+
+	if (led_set_func_tpacpi &&
+		(action == HDA_FIXUP_ACT_FREE || ret_fixup_acpi)) {
+
 		symbol_put(tpacpi_led_set);
-		led_set_func = NULL;
+		remove = true;
+	}
+
+	if (led_set_func_hid_lenovo &&
+		(action == HDA_FIXUP_ACT_FREE || ret_fixup_hid)) {
+
+		symbol_put(hid_lenovo_led_set);
+		remove = true;
+	}
+
+
+	if (remove) {
+		led_set_func_tpacpi = NULL;
+		led_set_func_hid_lenovo = NULL;
 		old_vmaster_hook = NULL;
 	}
 }
... reading through the patch, I find the code is a bit too
redundant.  The access is exclusive between ACPI and HID, and the hook
functions are in the same form but just the argument value is
different (TPACPI_LED_MUTE vs HID_LENOVO_LED_MUTE).  So we may need
only a single function pointer and pass the different value depending
on the model instead of keeping two individual function pointers.


thanks,

Takashi
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help