On 07/20/2016 09:36 AM, Jason Gerecke wrote:

On 07/12/2016 12:32 AM, Benjamin Tissoires wrote:

quoted

Hi Jason,

On Jul 11 2016 or thereabouts, Jason Gerecke wrote:

quoted

If a touchscreen contains both multitouch and single-touch reports in its
descriptor in that order, the driver may overwrite information it saved
about the format of the multitouch report. This can cause the report
processing code to get tripped up and send an incorrect event stream to
userspace.

In particular, this can cause last_slot_field to be overwritten with the
result that the driver prematurely assumes it has finished processing a
slot and sending the ABS_MT_SLOT event at the wrong point in time,
associating events for the current contact with the following contact
instead.

To prevent this from occuring, we stop mapping usages after having seen
HID_DG_CONTACTCOUNT. This usage is only present in multitouch reports,
so the format of any following single-touch reports will have no effect.

I had a quick look at the driver, and it looks like the Cintiq Companion
2 has more than one multitouch collection (see 499522c "HID: wacom: Tie
cached HID_DG_CONTACTCOUNT indices to report ID").

So if this doesn't break the cintiq companion 2, you have my
reviewed-by, but I'd rather be sure (and please see if we really need to
keep 499522c then).

Cheers,
Benjamin

Thanks for the reminder about 499522c. This patch should supersede it in
terms of functionality, so I can make a patch to remove it instead.

As far as compatibility goes, I don't have a Companion 2 to actually
test, but looking at the descriptor [1], it shouldn't pose any problems:
the second report containing HID_DG_CONTACTCOUNT is the single-touch
report that we don't want to use anyway.

[1]:
https://github.com/linuxwacom/wacom-hid-descriptors/blob/master/Wacom%20Cintiq%20Companion%202/0003:056A:0326.0002.hid.txt

Jason
---
Now instead of four in the eights place /
you’ve got three, ‘Cause you added one /
(That is to say, eight) to the two, /
But you can’t take seven from three, /
So you look at the sixty-fours....

On closer inspection, it's probably not right to say that this patch
supersedes 499522c. It does remove the need for it, but only under the
(currently valid) assumption that the first report with
HID_DG_CONTACTCOUNT is the report the tablet will send.

If we want to be free of that assumption, it might be a better idea to
replace this patch with something that instead does additional work in
the pre_report phase to update last_slot_field (just like how 499522c
updates cc_index and cc_value_index during pre_report).

Thoughts?

Jason
---
Now instead of four in the eights place /
you’ve got three, ‘Cause you added one /
(That is to say, eight) to the two, /
But you can’t take seven from three, /
So you look at the sixty-fours....

quoted

quoted

Signed-off-by: Jason Gerecke <jason.gerecke@wacom.com>
---
 drivers/hid/wacom_wac.c | 5 +++++
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)

diff --git a/drivers/hid/wacom_wac.c b/drivers/hid/wacom_wac.c
index fcf2264..e499cdb 100644
--- a/drivers/hid/wacom_wac.c
+++ b/drivers/hid/wacom_wac.c

@@ -1560,6 +1560,11 @@ static void wacom_wac_finger_usage_mapping(struct hid_device *hdev,
 	struct input_dev *input = wacom_wac->touch_input;
 	unsigned touch_max = wacom_wac->features.touch_max;
 
+	/* stop processing after the first multitouch report */
+	if (wacom_wac->hid_data.cc_report &&
+	    wacom_wac->hid_data.cc_report != field->report->id)
+		return;
+
 	switch (usage->hid) {
 	case HID_GD_X:
 		features->last_slot_field = usage->hid;

-- 
2.9.0

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-input" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html