Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] sur40: properly report a single frame rate of 60 FPS
From: Florian Echtler <hidden>
Date: 2016-07-05 06:56:55
Also in:
linux-media
Attachments
- signature.asc [application/pgp-signature] 198 bytes
From: Florian Echtler <hidden>
Date: 2016-07-05 06:56:55
Also in:
linux-media
Hello Hans, On 05.07.2016 08:41, Hans Verkuil wrote:
On 05/31/2016 10:15 PM, Florian Echtler wrote:quoted
The device hardware is always running at 60 FPS, so report this both via PARM_IOCTL and ENUM_FRAMEINTERVALS. Signed-off-by: Martin Kaltenbrunner <redacted> Signed-off-by: Florian Echtler <redacted> --- drivers/input/touchscreen/sur40.c | 20 ++++++++++++++++++-- 1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)@@ -880,6 +893,9 @@ static const struct v4l2_ioctl_ops sur40_video_ioctl_ops = { .vidioc_enum_framesizes = sur40_vidioc_enum_framesizes, .vidioc_enum_frameintervals = sur40_vidioc_enum_frameintervals, + .vidioc_g_parm = sur40_ioctl_parm, + .vidioc_s_parm = sur40_ioctl_parm,Why is s_parm added when you can't change the framerate?
Oh, I thought it's mandatory to always have s_parm if you have g_parm (even if it always returns the same values).
Same questions for the enum_frameintervals function: it doesn't hurt to have it, but if there is only one unchangeable framerate, then it doesn't make much sense.
If you don't have enum_frameintervals, how would you find out about the framerate otherwise? Is g_parm itself enough already for all userspace tools?
Sorry, missed this when I reviewed this the first time around.
No problem. Best, Florian -- SENT FROM MY DEC VT50 TERMINAL