On Friday, June 24, 2016 10:28:50 AM CEST Jiri Kosina wrote:
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
From: Jiri Kosina <redacted>
Use IS_ENABLED() for checking USB_HIDDEV to make sure compilation works
for all possible config combinations.
Signed-off-by: Jiri Kosina <redacted>
---
include/linux/hiddev.h | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/hiddev.h b/include/linux/hiddev.h
index a5dd814..b6f48d6 100644
--- a/include/linux/hiddev.h
+++ b/include/linux/hiddev.h
@@ -37,7 +37,7 @@ struct hid_usage;
struct hid_field;
struct hid_report;
-#ifdef CONFIG_USB_HIDDEV
+#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_USB_HIDDEV)
int hiddev_connect(struct hid_device *hid, unsigned int force);
void hiddev_disconnect(struct hid_device *);
void hiddev_hid_event(struct hid_device *hid, struct hid_field *field,
CONFIG_USB_HIDDEV is a 'bool' option, so the two look completely
equivalent.
If we wanted to make USB_HIDDEV a loadable module by itself,
we'd also need to export those functions and change both the Kconfig
and Makefile files to ensure that you can't have USB_HIDDEV=m
in combination with USB_HID=y.
What problem are you trying to fix specifically?
Arnd