On 23.06.2016 00:08, Nick Dyer wrote:
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
diff --git a/drivers/input/touchscreen/sur40.c b/drivers/input/touchscreen/sur40.c
index 880c40b..841e045 100644
--- a/drivers/input/touchscreen/sur40.c
+++ b/drivers/input/touchscreen/sur40.c
@@ -599,7 +599,7 @@ static int sur40_probe(struct usb_interface *interface,
sur40->vdev.queue = &sur40->queue;
video_set_drvdata(&sur40->vdev, sur40);
- error = video_register_device(&sur40->vdev, VFL_TYPE_GRABBER, -1);
+ error = video_register_device(&sur40->vdev, VFL_TYPE_TOUCH, -1);
if (error) {
dev_err(&interface->dev,
"Unable to register video subdevice.");
As far as I could tell from looking at patch 1/9, the only visible
change for userspace will be the device name, so I'd be fine with this.
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
@@ -794,7 +794,7 @@ static int sur40_vidioc_enum_fmt(struct file *file, void *priv,
if (f->index != 0)
return -EINVAL;
strlcpy(f->description, "8-bit greyscale", sizeof(f->description));
- f->pixelformat = V4L2_PIX_FMT_GREY;
+ f->pixelformat = V4L2_TCH_FMT_TU08;
I would suggest to leave the pixel format as it is. Rationale: the data
really is greyscale image intensity data (as also evidenced by [1]), not
just a synthetic image, and changing the pixel format would break all
userspace tools.
[1] https://github.com/mkalten/reacTIVision/issues/3#issuecomment-99931807
Best, Florian
--
SENT FROM MY DEC VT50 TERMINAL