Thread (17 messages) flat view 17 messages, 4 authors, 2016-05-27

Re: [PATCH] Input: pwm-beeper - fix: scheduling while atomic

From: Manfred Schlaegl <hidden>
Date: 2016-05-19 07:53:07
Also in: lkml

On 2016-05-18 18:06, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
On Wed, May 18, 2016 at 05:16:49PM +0200, Manfred Schlaegl wrote:
quoted
Pwm config may sleep so defer it using a worker.

Trigger:
On a Freescale i.MX53 based board we ran into "BUG: scheduling while
atomic" because input_inject_event locks interrupts, but
imx_pwm_config_v2 sleeps.

Tested on Freescale i.MX53 SoC with 4.6.0 and 4.1.24.

Unmodified applicable to
 * 4.6    (stable)
 * 4.5.4  (stable)
 * 4.4.10 (longterm)
 * 4.1.24 (longterm)

Modified applicable to
 * 3.18.33 (longterm)
What does this all mean?  Have you read
Documentation/stable_kernel_rules.txt for how to mark things for stable
inclusion?

thanks,

greg k-h
Sorry, I'm afraid I missed that. Thanks for the clarification. I will respect that in the future.

Should I resend the patch with a cleaned up message (without "Unmodified applicable to" and "Modified applicable to" stuff)?
Is the rest of message (formally) ok?

thanks,
manfred
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help