Thread (5 messages) 5 messages, 4 authors, 2016-03-14

Re: [PATCH 05/13] input: convert sun4i-ts to use devm_thermal_zone_of_sensor_register

From: Hans de Goede <hidden>
Date: 2016-03-10 13:20:10
Also in: linux-arm-kernel, linux-pm, lkml

Hi,

On 10-03-16 10:34, Sascha Hauer wrote:
On Wed, Mar 09, 2016 at 01:35:27PM -0800, Eduardo Valentin wrote:
quoted
This changes the driver to use the devm_ version
of thermal_zone_of_sensor_register and cleans
up the  local points and unregister calls.

Cc: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>
Cc: Maxime Ripard <redacted>
Cc: Chen-Yu Tsai <redacted>
Cc: Hans de Goede <redacted>
Cc: Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com>
Cc: Lukasz Majewski <redacted>
Cc: Heiko Stuebner <heiko@sntech.de>
Cc: Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@pengutronix.de>
Cc: Jens Thiele <redacted>
Cc: linux-input@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Eduardo Valentin <edubezval@gmail.com>
---
  drivers/input/touchscreen/sun4i-ts.c | 9 +--------
  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 8 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/input/touchscreen/sun4i-ts.c b/drivers/input/touchscreen/sun4i-ts.c
index 4857943..d07dd29 100644
--- a/drivers/input/touchscreen/sun4i-ts.c
+++ b/drivers/input/touchscreen/sun4i-ts.c
@@ -115,7 +115,6 @@
  struct sun4i_ts_data {
  	struct device *dev;
  	struct input_dev *input;
-	struct thermal_zone_device *tz;
  	void __iomem *base;
  	unsigned int irq;
  	bool ignore_fifo_data;
@@ -366,10 +365,7 @@ static int sun4i_ts_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
  	if (IS_ERR(hwmon))
  		return PTR_ERR(hwmon);

-	ts->tz = thermal_zone_of_sensor_register(ts->dev, 0, ts,
-						 &sun4i_ts_tz_ops);
-	if (IS_ERR(ts->tz))
-		ts->tz = NULL;
+	devm_thermal_zone_of_sensor_register(ts->dev, 0, ts, &sun4i_ts_tz_ops);
Shouldn't we check the return value? There are a few possibilities for
thermal_zone_of_sensor_register to fail.
Note thee old code also was not checking this, it was simply continuing
without having registered a tz-sensor.

I guess we could log an error in that case, but that should be done in a
seperate follow-up patch.

The current patch looks good to me:

Acked-by: Hans de Goede <redacted>

Regards,

Hans
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help