On Wed, Jan 13, 2016 at 05:27:41PM +0530, Aniroop Mathur wrote:
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
If last event in old queue that was dropped was EV_SYN/SYN_REPORT, then
lets generate EV_SYN/SYN_REPORT immediately after queing EV_SYN/SYN_DROPPED
so that clients would not ignore next valid full packet events.
Signed-off-by: Aniroop Mathur <redacted>
---
drivers/input/evdev.c | 45 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------
1 file changed, 33 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/input/evdev.c b/drivers/input/evdev.c
index e9ae3d5..0bc7b98 100644
--- a/drivers/input/evdev.c
+++ b/drivers/input/evdev.c
@@ -156,7 +156,12 @@ static void __evdev_flush_queue(struct evdev_client *client, unsigned int type)
static void __evdev_queue_syn_dropped(struct evdev_client *client)
{
struct input_event ev;
+ struct input_event *prev_ev;
ktime_t time;
+ unsigned int mask = client->bufsize - 1;
+
+ /* store previous event */
+ prev_ev = &client->buffer[(client->head - 1) & mask];
How do you know that previous event is valid/exists? In fact, when we
are dropping events due to the full queue, you will be referencing the
newest event being processed, not the previous event.
I also wonder if this code is safe with regard to __evdev_flush_queue()
that is dropping bunch of events and possible empty SYN_REPORT groups.
Thanks.
--
Dmitry