Hi,

Thanks for submitting this. I have just a couple of questions...

On Tue, 15 Dec 2015 12:24:32 +0100, Böszörményi Zoltán
[off-list ref] wrote:

+static int egalax_init(int fd, unsigned long *id, unsigned long *extra) {
+	unsigned char packet_alive_query[3] = { 0x0a, 0x01, 'A' };
+	unsigned char packet_fw_ver[3] = { 0x0a, 0x01, 'D' };
+	unsigned char packet_ctrl_type[3] = { 0x0a, 0x01, 'E' };
+	unsigned char response[128];
+
+	if (check_egalax_response(fd, packet_alive_query, sizeof(packet_alive_query), response))
+		return -1;
+
+	if (check_egalax_response(fd, packet_fw_ver, sizeof(packet_fw_ver), response))
+		return -1;
+
+	response[(unsigned char)response[1] + 2] = '\0';
+	printf("EETI eGalaxTouch firmware: %s\n", &response[3]);

inputattach is generally silent when everything goes well. I can see how this
kind of info would be useful though; would you mind simply commenting the
printf() lines out, and I'll add a verbose mode later on?

+
+	if (check_egalax_response(fd, packet_ctrl_type, sizeof(packet_ctrl_type), response))
+		return -1;
+
+	response[(unsigned char)response[1] + 2] = '\0';
+	printf("EETI eGalaxTouch controller type: %s\n", &response[3]);

As above.

+#ifdef SERIO_HAMPSHIRE
+{ "--hampshire",   "-ham",         "Hampshire touchscreen",
+	B9600, CS8,
+	SERIO_HAMPSHIRE,	0x00,   0x00,   0,  NULL },
+#endif

Is this intentional? If so, could you mention it in the commit message?

Thanks,

Stephen

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
Linuxconsole-dev mailing list
Linuxconsole-dev@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linuxconsole-dev