Thread (17 messages) 17 messages, 4 authors, 2015-12-02

Re: [PATCH 3/6] Input: Update vmmouse.c to use the common VMW_PORT macros

From: Sinclair Yeh <hidden>
Date: 2015-12-02 02:19:49
Also in: lkml

Possibly related (same subject, not in this thread)

On Tue, Dec 01, 2015 at 04:04:08PM -0800, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
On Tue, Dec 01, 2015 at 02:54:20PM -0800, Sinclair Yeh wrote:
quoted
Hi,

On Tue, Dec 01, 2015 at 02:45:27PM -0800, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
quoted
On Tue, Dec 1, 2015 at 2:32 PM, Sinclair Yeh [off-list ref] wrote:
quoted
Hi,
<snip>
quoted
quoted
quoted
quoted
  */
-#define VMMOUSE_CMD(cmd, in1, out1, out2, out3, out4)      \
-({                                                 \
-   unsigned long __dummy1, __dummy2;               \
-   __asm__ __volatile__ ("inl %%dx" :              \
-           "=a"(out1),                             \
-           "=b"(out2),                             \
-           "=c"(out3),                             \
-           "=d"(out4),                             \
-           "=S"(__dummy1),                         \
-           "=D"(__dummy2) :                        \
-           "a"(VMMOUSE_PROTO_MAGIC),               \
-           "b"(in1),                               \
-           "c"(VMMOUSE_PROTO_CMD_##cmd),           \
-           "d"(VMMOUSE_PROTO_PORT) :               \
-           "memory");                              \
+#define VMMOUSE_CMD(cmd, in1, out1, out2, out3, out4)                 \
+({                                                            \
+   unsigned long __dummy1 = 0, __dummy2 = 0;                  \
Why do we need to initialize dummies?
Because for some commands those parameters to VMW_PORT() can be both
input and outout.
The vmmouse commands do not use them as input though, so it seems we
are simply wasting CPU cycles setting them to 0 just because we are
using the new VMW_PORT here. Why do we need to switch? What is the
benefit of doing this?
There are two reasons.  One is to make the code more readable and
maintainable.  Rather than having mostly similar inline assembly
code sprinkled across multiple modules, we can just use the macros
and document that.
But the macro is only used here, and the variables aren't used at all,
so it makes no sense in this file.
Maybe it's because I didn't CC you on the rest of the series.  I wasn't
sure what the proper distribution list is for each part.

This new macro is also used in arch/x86/kernel/cpu/vmware.c and
vmw_balloon.c

quoted
The second reason is this organization makes some on-going future
development easier.
We don't plan for "future" development other than a single patch series,
as we have no idea what that development is, nor if it will really
happen.  You can always change this file later if you need to, nothing
is keeping that from happening.
So the intent of this series is to centralize similar lines of inline
assembly code that are currently used by 3 different kernel modules
to a central place.  The new vmware.h [patch 0/6] becomes the one header
to include for common guest-host communication needs.

thanks,

greg k-h
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help