Thread (2 messages) 2 messages, 2 authors, 2015-10-19

Re: [PATCH] xen: check return value of xenbus_printf

From: Julien Grall <hidden>
Date: 2015-10-19 14:32:11
Also in: lkml

Hi,

On 19/10/15 15:10, Insu Yun wrote:
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
Internally, xenbus_printf uses memory allocation, so it can be failed in
memory pressure.Therefore, xenbus_printf's return should be checked
and properly handled.

Signed-off-by: Insu Yun <redacted>
---
 drivers/input/misc/xen-kbdfront.c | 10 ++++++++--
 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/input/misc/xen-kbdfront.c b/drivers/input/misc/xen-kbdfront.c
index 23d0549..9d465d7 100644
--- a/drivers/input/misc/xen-kbdfront.c
+++ b/drivers/input/misc/xen-kbdfront.c
@@ -129,8 +129,14 @@ static int xenkbd_probe(struct xenbus_device *dev,
 
 	if (xenbus_scanf(XBT_NIL, dev->otherend, "feature-abs-pointer", "%d", &abs) < 0)
 		abs = 0;
-	if (abs)
-		xenbus_printf(XBT_NIL, dev->nodename, "request-abs-pointer", "1");
+	if (abs) {
+		ret = xenbus_printf(XBT_NIL, dev->nodename,
+					"request-abs-pointer", "1");
The second line of arguments should be aligned to the first parameter. I.e:

xenbus_printf(XBT_NIL, dev->nodename,
              "request-abs-pointer", "1");

See an example in xenkbd_backend_changed.

With that fixed:

Reviewed-by: Julien Grall <redacted>
+		if (ret) {
+			pr_warning("xenkbd: can't request abs-pointer");
Note that checkpatch.pl will print a warning here:

WARNING: Prefer pr_warn(... to pr_warning(...
#27: FILE: drivers/input/misc/xen-kbdfront.c:136:
+                       pr_warning("xenkbd: can't request abs-pointer");


Although, I'm fine if you don't fix this one.
+			abs = 0;
+		}
+	}
 
 	/* keyboard */
 	kbd = input_allocate_device();
Regards,

-- 
Julien Grall
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help