Thread (5 messages) 5 messages, 2 authors, 2015-10-02

Re: [patch] Input: ff-core - silence an underflow warning

From: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>
Date: 2015-09-29 23:03:15
Also in: kernel-janitors

On Tue, Sep 29, 2015 at 04:12:58PM +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote:
On Mon, Sep 28, 2015 at 05:28:30PM -0700, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
quoted
On Tue, Sep 22, 2015 at 04:26:43PM +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote:
quoted
My static checker complains that "value" comes from the user in
evdev_do_ioctl() and we check that it's not too large here but we don't
check that it's negative.  It's harmless because the ->set_gain() and
->set_autocenter() functions truncate it to a valid u16 value, but we
may as well fix it just to make the static checker happy.

Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <redacted>
diff --git a/drivers/input/ff-core.c b/drivers/input/ff-core.c
index c642082..6a94c5f 100644
--- a/drivers/input/ff-core.c
+++ b/drivers/input/ff-core.c
@@ -273,14 +273,14 @@ int input_ff_event(struct input_dev *dev, unsigned int type,
 
 	switch (code) {
 	case FF_GAIN:
-		if (!test_bit(FF_GAIN, dev->ffbit) || value > 0xffff)
+		if (!test_bit(FF_GAIN, dev->ffbit) || value > 0xffffUL)
 			break;
 
 		ff->set_gain(dev, value);
 		break;
 
 	case FF_AUTOCENTER:
-		if (!test_bit(FF_AUTOCENTER, dev->ffbit) || value > 0xffff)
+		if (!test_bit(FF_AUTOCENTER, dev->ffbit) || value > 0xffffUL)
Why UL and not U?
You're right.  That could just be U.  I'll resend.
That's fine, I'll adjust on my side.

Thanks.

-- 
Dmitry
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help