Re: [patch] Input: ff-core - silence an underflow warning
From: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>
Date: 2015-09-29 23:03:15
Also in:
kernel-janitors
On Tue, Sep 29, 2015 at 04:12:58PM +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote:
On Mon, Sep 28, 2015 at 05:28:30PM -0700, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:quoted
On Tue, Sep 22, 2015 at 04:26:43PM +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote:quoted
My static checker complains that "value" comes from the user in evdev_do_ioctl() and we check that it's not too large here but we don't check that it's negative. It's harmless because the ->set_gain() and ->set_autocenter() functions truncate it to a valid u16 value, but we may as well fix it just to make the static checker happy. Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <redacted>diff --git a/drivers/input/ff-core.c b/drivers/input/ff-core.c index c642082..6a94c5f 100644 --- a/drivers/input/ff-core.c +++ b/drivers/input/ff-core.c@@ -273,14 +273,14 @@ int input_ff_event(struct input_dev *dev, unsigned int type, switch (code) { case FF_GAIN: - if (!test_bit(FF_GAIN, dev->ffbit) || value > 0xffff) + if (!test_bit(FF_GAIN, dev->ffbit) || value > 0xffffUL) break; ff->set_gain(dev, value); break; case FF_AUTOCENTER: - if (!test_bit(FF_AUTOCENTER, dev->ffbit) || value > 0xffff) + if (!test_bit(FF_AUTOCENTER, dev->ffbit) || value > 0xffffUL)Why UL and not U?You're right. That could just be U. I'll resend.
That's fine, I'll adjust on my side. Thanks. -- Dmitry