Thread (57 messages) 57 messages, 11 authors, 2015-10-04

Re: [RFC PATCH] PM / Runtime: runtime: Add sysfs option for forcing runtime suspend

From: Rafael J. Wysocki <hidden>
Date: 2015-09-27 13:13:10
Also in: linux-pm, lkml

On Saturday, September 26, 2015 11:20:50 AM Alan Stern wrote:
On Sat, 26 Sep 2015, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
quoted
quoted
quoted
So something like:

	echo on >/sys/.../power/control  (in case the device was
			already in runtime suspend with wakeups enabled)
	echo off >/sys/.../power/wakeup
	echo auto >/sys/.../power/control
Cases where the driver wants to avoid runtime suspend (while the device
is active) because of bad wakeup support in the hardware can be handled
easily enough.  The runtime-idle or runtime-suspend callback routine
can check whether wakeup == off; if it isn't then the callback should
return -EBUSY.  Thus the driver can prevent runtime suspend without any
need to increment the usage counter.
Right.
quoted
quoted
That, or there may be an additional value, say "aggressive", to write to the
control file in which case it becomes just

echo aggressive >/sys/.../power/control
That said I suppose that the "off" value for the "wakeup" file might also be
useful in some other cases, so it likely is a better approach.
We still need some sort of "inhibit" callback for cases where the
driver doesn't want to go into runtime suspend but does want to turn
off all I/O.  Should this callback be triggered when the user writes
"off" to power/wakeup, or when the user writes "inhibit" to
power/control, or should there be a separate sysfs attribute?
My first thought is that if there is a separate attribute, then it only actually
makes sense for devices that generate input events, while the "off" thing may
be generally useful in principle (eg. it may indicate to disable PME for the
device to the PCI layer etc).

OTOH, the additional "inhibit" attribute may only be exposed if the corresponding
callback is present, so I'm not really sure.

Question is, though, what's the use case for turning off I/O when we don't
go into runtime suspend.  After all, runtime suspend need not mean putting
the device into any kind of low-power state and the "off" thing may very
well be defined to mean that all input is discarded if the device is
runtime-suspended and the device is not configured to do remote wakeup
then.

Thanks,
Rafael
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help