Re: [PATCH v2] Input: drivers/joystick: use parallel port device model
From: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>
Date: 2015-08-13 16:26:09
Also in:
lkml
On Thu, Aug 13, 2015 at 07:16:14PM +0530, Sudip Mukherjee wrote:
On Sat, Aug 08, 2015 at 04:05:15PM +0530, Sudip Mukherjee wrote:quoted
On Tue, Aug 04, 2015 at 07:55:51PM +0530, Sudip Mukherjee wrote:quoted
Modify db9 driver to use the new Parallel Port device model. Signed-off-by: Sudip Mukherjee <redacted> --- v2: an extra check was removed. db9_base could not be removed. Already mailed you the reasons, reference is at: https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/8/3/403Hi Dmitry, I was telling you on the other thread that to remove db9_base we will need to modify the parport code and then it has to be tested by everyone again and that will also change the old behaviour of parport. The v2 to which I am replying now is still having that db9_base. Please see the following patch, this is the minimum change required to update db9 driver. Personally I donot like this approach as in this method if a parallel port is hotplugged after this driver is loaded then it will not work. Please let me know your views on the posted v2 and also on the following proposal.Hi Dmitry, Did you have a chance to look at this?
Right, so I agree that we should allow for hotplug and so the v2 is in that sense is better than v3. I still would prefer for the core to keep track of relationship between devices and drivers, but if you would prefer to postpone implementing it that woudl be fine.
Pali Rohár has the hardware and he is ready to test it.
Pali, could you give the v2 version of the patch a spin (https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/6940321/)? Thanks. -- Dmitry -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-input" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html