On Wed 2015-07-22 21:49:06, Jiri Kosina wrote:

On Wed, 22 Jul 2015, Vlastimil Babka wrote:

quoted

[  101.805120] usb 3-4: new low-speed USB device number 3 using xhci_hcd
[  101.979584] usb 3-4: New USB device found, idVendor=046d, idProduct=c50e
[  101.979589] usb 3-4: New USB device strings: Mfr=1, Product=2, SerialNumber=0
[  101.979592] usb 3-4: Product: USB Receiver
[  101.979594] usb 3-4: Manufacturer: Logitech
[  101.979805] usb 3-4: ep 0x81 - rounding interval to 64 microframes, ep desc says 80 microframes
[  101.989010] hid-generic 0003:046D:C50E.0003: Mapped LED usage 4b as LED 8
[  101.989014] hid-generic 0003:046D:C50E.0003: Mapped LED usage 4b as LED 8
[  101.989017] hid-generic 0003:046D:C50E.0003: Mapped LED usage 4b as LED 8
[  101.989019] hid-generic 0003:046D:C50E.0003: Mapped LED usage 4b as LED 8
[  101.989021] hid-generic 0003:046D:C50E.0003: Mapped LED usage 4b as LED 8
[  101.989023] hid-generic 0003:046D:C50E.0003: Mapped LED usage 4b as LED 8
[  101.989025] hid-generic 0003:046D:C50E.0003: Mapped LED usage 4b as LED 8
[  101.989027] hid-generic 0003:046D:C50E.0003: Mapped LED usage 4b as LED 8
[  101.989091] input: Logitech USB Receiver as /devices/pci0000:00/0000:00:14.0/usb3/3-4/3-4:1.0/0003:046D:C50E.0003/input/input14
[  102.039320] ------------[ cut here ]------------
[  102.039329] WARNING: CPU: 6 PID: 168 at ../drivers/input/input-leds.c:115 input_leds_connect+0x22b/0x260()

(5 WARNINGs as before)

[  102.040729] hid-generic 0003:046D:C50E.0003: input,hidraw2: USB HID v1.11 Mouse [Logitech USB Receiver] on usb-0000:00:14.0-4/input0

Alright, I think it's pretty obvious what's happening. Vlastimil, am I 
right that the patch below fixes the issue?

I am however not sure whether input_leds_connect() is not too unkind to 
unnamed LEDs and shouldn't be more tolerant to those in the long term.

Maybe.

From: Jiri Kosina <redacted>
Subject: [PATCH] Input: leds: don't attempt to deregister unnamed LEDs

input_leds_connect() is skipping registration of LEDs for which
there is no symbolic name in input_led_info[].

Yes, and rather than testing for "no name" special case at two places,
what about simply giving up when we see such error?

S-o-b: me.

diff --git a/drivers/input/input-leds.c b/drivers/input/input-leds.c
index 074a65e..5f300e6 100644
--- a/drivers/input/input-leds.c
+++ b/drivers/input/input-leds.c

@@ -112,7 +112,11 @@ static int input_leds_connect(struct input_handler *handler,
 		led->handle = &leds->handle;
 		led->code = led_code;
 
-		if (WARN_ON(!input_led_info[led_code].name))
+		if (!input_led_info[led_code].name) {
+			printk(KERN_ERR, "LED with no name\n");
+			error = -EINVAL;
+			goto err_unregister_leds;
+		}
 			continue;
 
 		led->cdev.name = kasprintf(GFP_KERNEL, "%s::%s",

-- 
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html