Thread (8 messages) flat view 8 messages, 3 authors, 2015-07-20

Re: [PATCH 1/2] input: touchscreen: pixcir_i2c_ts: Add support for optional wakeup interrupt

From: Tony Lindgren <hidden>
Date: 2015-07-20 09:48:11
Also in: linux-arm-kernel, linux-devicetree, linux-omap, lkml

* Dmitry Torokhov [off-list ref] [150719 23:36]:
On Sun, Jul 19, 2015 at 11:05:07PM -0700, Tony Lindgren wrote:
quoted
* Vignesh R [off-list ref] [150719 21:51]:
quoted
On 7/18/2015 3:21 AM, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
quoted
I wonder if driver core should be responsible for clearing wake irq and
also for clearing wakeup flag.
AFAICU, wakeup flag is deleted when struct device is deleted, hence,
device_init_wakeup() call may not be required in .remove(). But,
dev_pm_clear_wake_irq() can be moved to driver core.
Currently the lifecycle of struct wakeup_source is not necessarily
the same as the lifecycle struct device. I believe net and usb drivers
at least allocate it dynamically.
I am not sure if I follow. I was wondering if we should clear the wakeup
IRQ setting on the driver unbinding. It does not mean that we'd be
deleting wakeup_source, just that we'll clear wakeup irq setting from
it.
Yes you're right we can do that. I was mostly commenting on why we
currently can't automate things further with devm.

Regards,

Tony
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help