On Thu, Feb 26, 2015 at 04:27:49PM +0200, Laurent Pinchart wrote:

Hi Wolfram,

On Monday 26 January 2015 13:09:47 Wolfram Sang wrote:

quoted

quoted

quoted

quoted

If you drop adi,adxl346, checkpatch will start complaining if it
encounters
it in a .dts.

Boah, this is annoying. That means we need an 346 entry even if it is
not different from 345 (which is fine by me).

To be clear: you need the entry in the documentation. It can be omitted
from the driver if it's not (yet) used for matching.

Well, I don't really like that behaviour, but I don't like
i2c/trivial-devices.txt as well, so I'll just apply the patch and live
with it :)

What happened to this patch ?

My idea was that Dmitry takes them both because they are related:

http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.drivers.i2c/21763