Re: Bug in i2c-core?
From: Laurent Pinchart <hidden>
Date: 2015-03-10 00:21:40
Also in:
linux-arm-kernel, linux-i2c
Hi Wolfram, On Sunday 08 March 2015 09:26:17 Wolfram Sang wrote:
On Wed, Mar 04, 2015 at 09:22:37AM +0100, Wolfram Sang wrote:quoted
quoted
quoted
quoted
I am writing an I2C touchscreen driver for an i.MX6 based board. I compiled it as a module and when I unload it, I get the following warning: # modprobe sx8654 [ 46.261494] input: SX8654 I2C Touchscreen as /devices/soc0/soc/2100000.aips-bus/21a0000.i2c/i2c-0/0-0048/input/in put1 # rmmod sx8654 [ 76.435223] ------------[ cut here ]------------ [ 76.439909] WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 134 at fs/proc/generic.c:552 remove_proc_entry+0x148/0x164() [ 76.448582] remove_proc_entry: removing non-empty directory 'irq/208', leaking at least 'sx8654'...quoted
When I revert commit e4df3a0 (i2c: core: Dispose OF IRQ mapping at client removal time) I don't get the warning. Is this a bug in the i2c-core or am I doing something wrong in my driver?Yes, this commit breaks all drivers using devm* for IRQ management on OF-based systemsi because devm* cleanup happens in device code, after bus's remove() method returns. I'd recommend reverting and finding a better way (making cleanup a custom devm action as well?).Ouch, my bad. Wolfram, any opinion ? The original patch fixes a real bug, so we shouldn't just revert it.Looking at it some more: What bug does it fix? Anything you experienced?
Good question, and I have to confess that I don't really remember :-/
quoted
I wonder if we really need e4df3a0 because I can't see where platform_get_irq, the major user of of_irq_get, disposes the mapping. irq_create_of_mapping() will return an already assigned mapping if called twice.
I've reached the same conclusion after reading the code. I was concerned about resource leakage, but that doesn't seem to be an issue.
quoted
I don't know yet, though, if mappings are static or if a mapping can be routed to another irq controller over some time because theoretically they can be dynamically added/removed. Adding Rob to CC as he wrote of_irq_get and put it into platform_get_irq. Rob, we use of_irq_get() in the I2C core and the question is now if we need to dispose the mapping and if so what would be a good place for it so managed devices will not have their mappings removed before the managed irq is removed.Ping. Just so you know: Without further information, I will revert the patch in question around rc4/rc5. I'd still like to know if the non-disposing of the mapping in platform_get_irq() is intentional.
I'll defer that to Rob. I'm fine with the revert at the moment. -- Regards, Laurent Pinchart