On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 06:45:33PM +0100, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:

On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 3:54 PM, Laurent Pinchart
[off-list ref] wrote:

quoted

The I2C subsystem can match devices without explicit OF support based on
the part of their compatible property after the comma. However, this
mechanism uses the first compatible value only. For adxl34x OF device
nodes the compatible property will contain the more specific
"adi,adxl345" or "adi,adxl346" value first. This prevents the device
node from being matched with the adxl34x driver.

Fix this by adding an OF match table with an "adi,adxl345" compatible
entry. There's no need to add the "adi,adxl346" entry as the ADXL346 is
backward-compatible with the ADXL345 with differences handled by runtime
detection of the device model.

Thanks!

quoted

Signed-off-by: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart+renesas-ryLnwIuWjnjg/C1BVhZhaw@public.gmane.org>

Acked-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <redacted>

quoted

--- a/drivers/input/misc/adxl34x-i2c.c
+++ b/drivers/input/misc/adxl34x-i2c.c

quoted

+#ifdef CONFIG_OF
+static const struct of_device_id adxl34x_of_id[] = {
+       /*
+        * The ADXL346 is backward-compatible with the ADXL345. Differences are
+        * handled by runtime detection of the device model, there's thus no
+        * need for listing the "adi,adxl346" compatible value explicitly.
+        */
+       { .compatible = "adi,adxl345", },
+       /*
+        * Deprecated, DT nodes should use one or more of the device-specific
+        * compatible values "adi,adxl345" and "adi,adxl346".

Ideally, the two comments above are moved to a real DT binding document ;-)

quoted

+        */
+       { .compatible = "adi,adxl34x", },

I'd append "/* deprecated */" to the line above, so "git grep adxl34x"
will show its deprecated status.

I still do not understand what we are trying to fix here. Why is
"adi,adxl34x" compatible string no good anymore? If we start using exact
models and the physical device does not match do we abort probe? What is
the problem that we are solving here?

Thanks.

-- 
Dmitry