On Fri, Jan 30, 2015 at 5:46 AM, Linus Walleij [off-list ref] wrote:

On Wed, Jan 21, 2015 at 10:33 PM, Olliver Schinagl
[off-list ref] wrote:

quoted

From: Olliver Schinagl <redacted>

The gpio binding document says that new code should always use named
gpios. Patch 40b73183 added support to parse a list of gpios from child
nodes, but does not make it possible to use named gpios. This patch adds
the con_id property and implements it is done in gpiolib.c, where the
old-style of using unnamed gpios still works.

Signed-off-by: Olliver Schinagl <redacted>
---
 drivers/gpio/devres.c                     | 18 +++++++++++++++++-
 drivers/input/keyboard/gpio_keys_polled.c |  2 +-
 drivers/leds/leds-gpio.c                  |  2 +-
 include/linux/gpio/consumer.h             |  1 +

Alexandre: does this match your vision of how it should work, i.e. ACK?

Bryan/Dmitry: can you ACK the oneliners in your subsystems?

Sure, please take my Ack
Acked-by: Bryan Wu <redacted>

Yours,
Linus Walleij