Thread (6 messages) 6 messages, 3 authors, 2015-01-21

Re: [PATCH 001/001] usbhid: Fix initialisation and force effect modifications for the Microsoft Sidewinder Force Feedback Pro 2 joystick

From: Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu>
Date: 2015-01-18 21:12:31
Also in: lkml

On Sun, 18 Jan 2015, Jim Keir wrote:
From: Jim Keir <redacted>
Signed-off-by: Jim Keir <redacted>

Currently the SWFF2 driver fails during initialisation, making the force
capability of the joystick unusable. Further, there is a long-standing
bug in the same driver where commands to update force parameters are
addressed to the last-created force effect instead of the specified one,
making it impossible to modify effects after their creation.

Three bugs are addressed:

1) The FF2 driver (usbhid/hid-pidff.c) sends commands to the stick
during ff_init. However, this is called inside a block where
driver_input_lock is locked, so the results of these initial commands
are discarded. This one is the "killer", without this nothing else works.

ff_init issues commands using "hid_hw_request". This eventually goes to
hid_input_report, which returns -EBUSY because driver_input_lock is
locked. The change is to delay the ff_init call in hid-core.c until
after this lock has been released.

2) The usbhid driver ignores an endpoint stall when sending control
commands, causing the first few commands of the hid-pidff.c
initialisation to get lost.

usbhid/hid-core.c has been modified by copying lines into "hid_ctrl"
from the "hid_irq_in" function in the same file.

3) The FF2 driver (usbhid/hid-pidff.c) does not set the effect ID when
uploading an effect. The result is that the initial upload works but
subsequent uploads to modify effect parameters are all directed at the
last-created effect.

The targeted effect ID must be passed back to the device when effect
parameters are changed. This is done at the start of
"pidff_set_condition_report", "pidff_set_periodic_report" etc. based on
the value of "pidff->block_load[PID_EFFECT_BLOCK_INDEX].value[0]".
However, this value is only ever set during pidff_request_effect_upload.
The result is stored in "pidff->pid_id[effect->id]" at the end of
pid_upload_effect, for later use. However, if an effect is modified and
re-sent then this identifier is not being copied back from
pidff->pid_id[effect->id] before sending the command to the device. The
fix is to do this at the start of pidff_upload_effect.

This patch taken against kernel 3.13.0
Three different changes should be split up into three different 
patches.  Also, you should test the patch by running it through 
checkpatch.pl before submitting it.

Regardless of those things, the second change (stall response to
control messages) is wrong for several reasons.
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
diff --git a/drivers/hid/usbhid/hid-core.c b/drivers/hid/usbhid/hid-core.c
index 029965e..5d34dd7 100644
--- a/drivers/hid/usbhid/hid-core.c
+++ b/drivers/hid/usbhid/hid-core.c
@@ -505,7 +505,12 @@ static void hid_ctrl(struct urb *urb)
      case -EPROTO:        /* protocol error or unplug */
      case -ECONNRESET:    /* unlink */
      case -ENOENT:
+        break;
      case -EPIPE:        /* report not available */
+        usbhid_mark_busy(usbhid);
+        clear_bit(HID_IN_RUNNING, &usbhid->iofl);
This is wrong.  The interrupt-IN endpoint is still running, because it 
is unaffected by an error on the control endpoint.
+        set_bit(HID_CLEAR_HALT, &usbhid->iofl);
This makes no sense.  Stalls on a control endpoint do not need a
clear-halt because the endpoint does not halt.  In any case, this flag
tells the driver to clear a halt condition on the interrupt-IN 
endpoint, not on the control endpoint.
+        schedule_work(&usbhid->reset_work);
          break;
      default:        /* error */
          hid_warn(urb->dev, "ctrl urb status %d received\n", status);
In general, there isn't much you can do about a control stall.  It 
means the device did not understand or does not support the request it 
received.  You can't force the device to respond to a request it 
doesn't understand; all you can do is report that the transfer failed.  
Which is what the driver currently does.

Alan Stern
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help