Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] Input: touchscreen-iproc: Add Broadcom iProc touchscreen driver
From: Jonathan Richardson <hidden>
Date: 2015-01-15 19:19:25
Also in:
linux-arm-kernel, linux-devicetree, lkml
On 15-01-14 05:08 PM, Florian Fainelli wrote:
On 19/12/14 15:03, Jonathan Richardson wrote:quoted
On 14-12-19 02:26 PM, Joe Perches wrote:quoted
On Fri, 2014-12-19 at 14:17 -0800, Jonathan Richardson wrote:quoted
Add initial version of the Broadcom touchscreen driver.more trivia:quoted
diff --git a/drivers/input/touchscreen/bcm_iproc_tsc.c b/drivers/input/touchscreen/bcm_iproc_tsc.c[]quoted
+static int get_tsc_config(struct device_node *np, struct iproc_ts_priv *priv) +{ + u32 val;[]quoted
+ if (of_property_read_u32(np, "debounce_timeout", &val) >= 0) { + if (val < 0 || val > 255) { + dev_err(dev, "debounce_timeout must be [0-255]\n"); + return -EINVAL; + } + priv->cfg_params.debounce_timeout = val;BTW, common practice for DT properties is to use a dash instead of an underscore for multi-worded properties.
ts-rotation is done that way already so I'll change the others to be consistent. Thanks.
quoted
quoted
Doesn't the compiler generate a warning message about an impossible "unsigned < 0" test for all of these "val < 0" uses?Actually no it doesn't. The gcc output shows that neither -Wtype-limits nor -Wextra are used to compile that file. I assume this is because there would be just too many warnings.quoted
quoted
+ } + + if (of_property_read_u32(np, "settling_timeout", &val) >= 0) { + if (val < 0 || val > 11) {[]quoted
+ if (of_property_read_u32(np, "touch_timeout", &val) >= 0) { + if (val < 0 || val > 255) {[]quoted
+ if (of_property_read_u32(np, "average_data", &val) >= 0) { + if (val < 0 || val > 8) {[]quoted
+ if (of_property_read_u32(np, "fifo_threshold", &val) >= 0) { + if (val < 0 || val > 31) {_______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel