Re: [PATCH 1/2] input: synaptics - make image sensors report ABS_MT_TOUCH_MAJOR
From: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>
Date: 2015-01-07 07:50:09
Also in:
lkml
On Mon, Jan 05, 2015 at 05:04:55PM -0500, Benjamin Tissoires wrote:
On Mon, Jan 5, 2015 at 5:00 PM, Gabriele Mazzotta [off-list ref] wrote:quoted
On Monday 05 January 2015 14:24:30 Benjamin Tissoires wrote:quoted
Hi Gabriele, [Adding Peter and Hans as this change will impact both xf86-input-synaptics and libinput] On Sat, Dec 27, 2014 at 6:31 AM, Gabriele Mazzotta [off-list ref] wrote:quoted
Despite claiming to be able to report ABS_TOOL_WIDTH, image sensors were not doing it. Make them report widths and use ABS_MT_TOUCH_MAJOR instead ABS_TOOL_WIDTH.It looks like the current xorg-synaptics code already handles ABS_MT_TOUCH_MAJOR as finger_width. So I think we should be good in replacing the ABS_TOOL_WIDTH event. However, I'd prefer having Peter confirm this because xorg-synaptics still relies a lot on the single touch emulation.quoted
Since the 'w' slot is used to report the finger count when two or more fingers are on the touchpad, make sure that only meaningful values are emitted, i.e. values greater than or equal to 4, and assign the correct range to ABS_MT_TOUCH_MAJOR. Link: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=77161 Signed-off-by: Gabriele Mazzotta <redacted> --- drivers/input/mouse/synaptics.c | 11 +++++++++-- 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)diff --git a/drivers/input/mouse/synaptics.c b/drivers/input/mouse/synaptics.c index f947292..ea0563e 100644 --- a/drivers/input/mouse/synaptics.c +++ b/drivers/input/mouse/synaptics.c@@ -814,6 +814,8 @@ static void synaptics_report_slot(struct input_dev *dev, int slot,Just FYI, this does not apply anymore on top of Dmitry's tree. synaptics_report_slot() has been removed, and you should now report the slot state in synaptics_report_mt_data().quoted
input_report_abs(dev, ABS_MT_POSITION_X, hw->x); input_report_abs(dev, ABS_MT_POSITION_Y, synaptics_invert_y(hw->y)); input_report_abs(dev, ABS_MT_PRESSURE, hw->z); + if (hw->w >= 4)That I don't like. IMO, at this point, .w should only contain the finger width, unconditionally. Also, with 2/2, .w is computed accurately for the second finger, but not for the first. I tried to figure out a way to properly extract the actual width information from the sgm packet when the w is 0 or 1, and the only way I found was to do the fix in synaptics_image_sensor_process(). I would have preferred dealing with that in synaptics_parse_hw_state() directly, but I think the final code would be more and more ugly. Dealing with the true finger width in synaptics_image_sensor_process() is not a problem for cr48 sensors, because they will not have the ABS_MT_TOUCH_MAJOR event exported.Regarding the last part on cr48 sensors. Currently these sensors are not reporting widths through ABS_TOOL_WIDTH and I don't see what could go wrong if they start reporting ABS_MT_TOUCH_MAJOR. If I understood correctly, they can report widths only when one finger is on the touchpad. This means that they will report widths through slot 0, but they won't through slot 1. Nothing bad should happen.I am not entirely sure. The entire purpose of having widht for palm detection is to filter palm from true finger events. So if we only have the width info on the first slot, it would be useless IMO. Still I agree with "nothing bad should happen" :)
From conceptual perspective if device is not capable of reporting
contact size for each contact then it should not be sending ABS_MT_TOUCH_MAJOR, same as we do not send ABS_MT_PRESSURE if we can't provide per-contact pressure. For such devices we revert to ST-events ABS_PRESSURE and I guess we'll have to continue with ABS_TOOL_WIDTH for contact sizes in Synaptics. Thanks. -- Dmitry