Re: [PATCH] psmouse: Add some support for the FocalTech PS/2 protocol extensions.
From: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>
Date: 2014-11-11 16:55:58
Hi Hans, On Mon, Oct 27, 2014 at 10:40:20AM +0100, Hans de Goede wrote:
Hi Matthias, On 10/25/2014 02:01 PM, Mathias Gottschlag wrote:quoted
+static void focaltech_report_state(struct psmouse *psmouse) +{ + int i; + struct focaltech_data *priv = psmouse->private; + struct focaltech_hw_state *state = &priv->state; + struct input_dev *dev = psmouse->dev; + int finger_count = 0; + + for (i = 0; i < FOC_MAX_FINGERS; i++) { + struct focaltech_finger_state *finger = &state->fingers[i]; + int active = finger->active && finger->valid; + input_mt_slot(dev, i); + input_mt_report_slot_state(dev, MT_TOOL_FINGER, active); + if (active) { + finger_count++; + input_report_abs(dev, ABS_MT_POSITION_X, finger->x); + input_report_abs(dev, ABS_MT_POSITION_Y, + focaltech_invert_y(finger->y)); + } + } + input_mt_report_pointer_emulation(dev, false); + input_mt_report_finger_count(dev, finger_count);These 2 lines should be replace with: input_mt_report_pointer_emulation(dev, finger_count); So that BTN_TOUCH properly gets set when at least one finger is down (this is mandatory when not reporting pressure).
I am baffled by this suggestion. input_mt_report_pointer_emulation() always report BTN_TOUCH, regardless of the value of the 2nd argument. Also, the name of the 2nd argument is "use_count" and it is boolean, so I am not sure why you are suggesting that we basically do: if (finger_count) input_mt_report_pointer_emulation(dev, true /*count them again */); else input_mt_report_pointer_emulation(dve, false); Did you mean to tell Mathias to call input_mt_report_pointer_emulation(dev, *true*); to instruct MT core to count contacts and emit appropriate BTN_TOOL_* based on number of contacts (if any)? Thanks. -- Dmitry