No  just an oversight..

Thanks,

Matt

On Fri, Oct 10, 2014 at 10:29 AM, Dmitry Torokhov
[off-list ref] wrote:

Hi Matt,

On Thu, Oct 09, 2014 at 09:23:02PM -0700, Matt Ranostay wrote:

quoted

@@ -63,7 +60,25 @@ struct cap11xx_priv {
      struct input_dev *idev;

      /* config */
-     unsigned short keycodes[CAP11XX_NUM_CHN];
+     unsigned int num_channels;
+     u32 keycodes[];

Any particular reason you decided to keep num_channels field givfen that
the same data is accessible through priv->idev->keycodemax?

Thanks.

--
Dmitry