Re: [linux-sunxi] Re: [PATCH v6 0/7] mfd: AXP20x: Add support for AXP202 and AXP209
From: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>
Date: 2014-05-22 19:55:23
Also in:
linux-arm-kernel
On Thu, May 22, 2014 at 09:15:12PM +0200, Carlo Caione wrote:
On Wed, May 21, 2014 at 11:14 AM, Lee Jones [off-list ref] wrote:quoted
quoted
quoted
quoted
This set of patches introduces the core driver and support for two different subsystems: - Regulatorsquoted
.../ABI/testing/sysfs-driver-input-axp-pek | 11 + Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/axp20x.txt | 93 +++++++ .../devicetree/bindings/vendor-prefixes.txt | 1 + arch/arm/configs/multi_v7_defconfig | 3 + arch/arm/configs/sunxi_defconfig | 4 + drivers/input/misc/Kconfig | 11 + drivers/input/misc/Makefile | 1 + drivers/input/misc/axp20x-pek.c | 281 +++++++++++++++++++++ drivers/mfd/Kconfig | 12 + drivers/mfd/Makefile | 1 + drivers/mfd/axp20x.c | 258 +++++++++++++++++++ include/linux/mfd/axp20x.h | 180 +++++++++++++ 12 files changed, 856 insertions(+)The regulator changes don't appear to be showing up in the diffstat or obviously in the series?Right. Cut-and-paste error. You have already applied the regulator patches so I didn't include them here (in theory I posted this series to be picked up by Lee).That's fine. Just tell me which patches need to stay together and which are able to be applied through their respective subsystem trees separately. Then, once I have all the Acks I can apply no problem.Hi Lee, I'd say #1 for the MFD tree, #4 for the input subsystem, #2 #3 and #5 are documentations, #6 and #7 defconfigs add-on.
I am fine with the input piece going through MFD tree, no need to split it from the rest. Thanks. -- Dmitry