Thread (5 messages) 5 messages, 2 authors, 2013-09-20

Re: [PATCH] input: touchscreen: add driver for Pixcir Tango C series capacitive touchscreen

flat view

From: Barry Song <hidden>
Date: 2013-09-19 23:52:22

Hi Dmitry,
thanks for quick reviewing.

2013/9/20 Dmitry Torokhov [off-list ref]:
Hi Barry,

On Thu, Sep 19, 2013 at 04:38:31PM +0800, Barry Song wrote:
quoted
From: Lisai Wang <redacted>

Pixcir Tango C series touchscreen support true multi-touch for 5 fingers. this
patch adds a driver for it.

Signed-off-by: Lisai Wang <redacted>
Signed-off-by: Qipan Li <redacted>
i made a mistake here, this should be Guoying.Zhang [off-list ref]
quoted
Signed-off-by: Barry Song <redacted>
---
 drivers/input/touchscreen/Kconfig            |   10 +
 drivers/input/touchscreen/Makefile           |    1 +
 drivers/input/touchscreen/pixcir_tangoc_ts.c |  242 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 3 files changed, 253 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
 create mode 100644 drivers/input/touchscreen/pixcir_tangoc_ts.c
diff --git a/drivers/input/touchscreen/Kconfig b/drivers/input/touchscreen/Kconfig
index e09ec67..2b80df6 100644
--- a/drivers/input/touchscreen/Kconfig
+++ b/drivers/input/touchscreen/Kconfig
@@ -919,4 +919,14 @@ config TOUCHSCREEN_TPS6507X
        To compile this driver as a module, choose M here: the
        module will be called tps6507x_ts.

+config TOUCHSCREEN_TANGOC
+     tristate "PIXCIR TANGOC touchscreen"
+     depends on I2C
+     help
+       Say Y here if you support PIXCIR TangoC touchscreen
+       controller
+
+       If unsure, Say N.
+       To compile this driver as a module, choose M here.
+
 endif
diff --git a/drivers/input/touchscreen/Makefile b/drivers/input/touchscreen/Makefile
index f5216c1..ef73c06 100644
--- a/drivers/input/touchscreen/Makefile
+++ b/drivers/input/touchscreen/Makefile
@@ -75,3 +75,4 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_TOUCHSCREEN_WM97XX_MAINSTONE)  += mainstone-wm97xx.o
 obj-$(CONFIG_TOUCHSCREEN_WM97XX_ZYLONITE)    += zylonite-wm97xx.o
 obj-$(CONFIG_TOUCHSCREEN_W90X900)    += w90p910_ts.o
 obj-$(CONFIG_TOUCHSCREEN_TPS6507X)   += tps6507x-ts.o
+obj-$(CONFIG_TOUCHSCREEN_TANGOC)     += pixcir_tangoc_ts.o
diff --git a/drivers/input/touchscreen/pixcir_tangoc_ts.c b/drivers/input/touchscreen/pixcir_tangoc_ts.c
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..8274917
--- /dev/null
+++ b/drivers/input/touchscreen/pixcir_tangoc_ts.c
@@ -0,0 +1,242 @@
+/*
+* Pixcir Tango C series 5 points touch controller Driver
+*
+* Copyright (c) 2013 Cambridge Silicon Radio Limited, a CSR plc group company.
+*
+* Licensed under GPLv2 or later.
+*/
+
+#include <linux/module.h>
+#include <linux/kernel.h>
+#include <linux/i2c.h>
+#include <linux/gpio.h>
+#include <linux/of_gpio.h>
+#include <linux/input.h>
+#include <linux/interrupt.h>
+#include <linux/slab.h>
+
+#define TOUCHSCREEN_MINX 0
+#define TOUCHSCREEN_MAXX 1024
+#define TOUCHSCREEN_MINY 0
+#define TOUCHSCREEN_MAXY 600
+#define TOUCH_MAJOR_MAX 50
+#define WIDTH_MAJOR_MAX 15
+#define TRACKING_ID_MAX 5
+
+struct pixcir_ts_point_data {
+     u16 posx;  /* x coordinate */
+     u16 posy;  /* y coordinate */
Since this represents on-wire data you need to specify endianess (__le16?) and
then explicitly convert it to CPU endianess when you use the data.
agree, this was tested on le ARM. so the original codes ignored be ARCH.
quoted
+     u8 id;    /* finger ID */
+} __packed;
+
+struct pixcir_ts_touch_data {
+     u16 touch_fingers;
This should be __le16 or __be16 as well.
quoted
+     struct pixcir_ts_point_data point[5];
+} __packed;
+
+struct pixcir_ts_data {
+     struct i2c_client *client;
+     struct input_dev *input_dev;
+     unsigned int touch_pin;
+     struct pixcir_ts_touch_data touch_data;
+};
+
+/*Report the touch position*/
+static void  pixcir_ts_report_event(struct pixcir_ts_data *ts)
+{
+     int ret, i;
+     int fingers;
+     u8 addr;
+
+     addr = 0;
+     ret = i2c_master_send(ts->client, &addr, sizeof(addr));
+     if (ret != sizeof(addr)) {
+             dev_err(&ts->client->dev,
+                             "pixcir_ts:Unable to reset pixcir_ts!\n");
Reset?
typo.
quoted
+             return;
+     }
+
+     ret = i2c_master_recv(ts->client, (char *)&ts->touch_data,
+                                     sizeof(struct pixcir_ts_touch_data));
+     if (ret != sizeof(struct pixcir_ts_touch_data)) {
+             dev_err(&ts->client->dev,
+                             "pixcir_ts:Unable get the touch info\n");
+             return;
+     }
Do you need 2 transactions? Can you use i2c_transfer() here?
ok.
quoted
+
+     fingers = ts->touch_data.touch_fingers & 0x07;
+     if (fingers > 0) {
+             for (i = 0; i < fingers; i++) {
+                     /*Get the touch position*/
+                     input_report_abs(ts->input_dev, ABS_MT_POSITION_X,
+                                     ts->touch_data.point[i].posx);
+                     input_report_abs(ts->input_dev, ABS_MT_POSITION_Y,
+                                     ts->touch_data.point[i].posy);
+
+                     input_report_key(ts->input_dev, ABS_MT_TRACKING_ID,
+                                     ts->touch_data.point[i].id);
+                     input_report_abs(ts->input_dev,
+                                     ABS_MT_TOUCH_MAJOR, TOUCH_MAJOR_MAX);
+                     input_report_abs(ts->input_dev,
+                                     ABS_MT_WIDTH_MAJOR, WIDTH_MAJOR_MAX);
+                     input_mt_sync(ts->input_dev);
Any chance we could use the B flavor of MT protocol?
i am sorry i missed some, what do you mean for B flavor ?
quoted
+             }
+     } else
+             input_mt_sync(ts->input_dev);
+
+     input_sync(ts->input_dev);
+}
+
+static irqreturn_t pixcir_ts_irq_handler(int irq, void *dev_id)
+{
+     struct pixcir_ts_data *ts = dev_id;
+
+     pixcir_ts_report_event(ts);
+
+     return IRQ_HANDLED;
+}
+
+#ifdef CONFIG_PM_SLEEP
+static int pixcir_ts_suspend(struct device *dev)
+{
+     struct i2c_client *client = to_i2c_client(dev);
+
+     if (device_may_wakeup(&client->dev))
+             enable_irq_wake(client->irq);
+
+     return 0;
+}
+
+static int pixcir_ts_resume(struct device *dev)
+{
+     struct i2c_client *client = to_i2c_client(dev);
+
+     if (device_may_wakeup(&client->dev))
+             disable_irq_wake(client->irq);
+
+     return 0;
+}
+
+static SIMPLE_DEV_PM_OPS(pixcir_dev_pm_ops,
+                     pixcir_ts_suspend, pixcir_ts_resume);
+#endif
+
+static int pixcir_ts_probe(struct i2c_client *client,
+                     const struct i2c_device_id *id)
+{
+     struct pixcir_ts_data *ts;
+     struct input_dev *input_dev;
+     struct device_node *np = client->dev.of_node;
+     u8 tmp = 0;
+     int ret;
+
+     if (!i2c_check_functionality(client->adapter, I2C_FUNC_I2C))
+             return -ENODEV;
+
+     ts = devm_kzalloc(&client->dev, sizeof(*ts), GFP_KERNEL);
+     if (!ts)
+             return -ENOMEM;
+     ts->client = client;
+     i2c_set_clientdata(client, ts);
+
+     ts->touch_pin = of_get_named_gpio(np, "touch-gpio", 0);
+     if (!gpio_is_valid(ts->touch_pin)) {
+             dev_err(&client->dev, "invalid touch_pin supplied\n");
+             return -EINVAL;
+     }
+     client->irq = gpio_to_irq(ts->touch_pin);
This should be done by the code that sets up i2c client, this driver
should simply use client->irq, not set it up.
the driver is based on DT. so here i guess the node should put right
interrupt_parent to a gpio controller and fill right interrupts prop
to fix it.
non-DT users can still fill i2c board_info in mach.
quoted
+
+     input_dev = input_allocate_device();
+     if (!input_dev) {
+             ret = -ENOMEM;
+             goto err_free_mem;
+     }
+
+     /* if the client exists, this i2c transfer should be ok */
+     ret = i2c_master_send(ts->client, &tmp, 1);
+     if (ret != 1)
+             goto err_free_mem;
+
+     i2c_set_clientdata(client, ts);
+     input_set_drvdata(input_dev, ts);
+     input_dev->name = "tangoc-touchscreen";
+     input_dev->id.bustype = BUS_I2C;
+     input_dev->dev.parent = &client->dev;
+     set_bit(EV_SYN, input_dev->evbit);
+     set_bit(EV_ABS, input_dev->evbit);
+     set_bit(ABS_MT_TOUCH_MAJOR, input_dev->absbit);
+     set_bit(ABS_MT_WIDTH_MAJOR, input_dev->absbit);
+     set_bit(ABS_MT_POSITION_X, input_dev->absbit);
+     set_bit(ABS_MT_POSITION_Y, input_dev->absbit);
+     set_bit(ABS_MT_TRACKING_ID, input_dev->absbit);
+     set_bit(INPUT_PROP_DIRECT, input_dev->propbit);
+     input_set_abs_params(input_dev, ABS_MT_POSITION_X,
+                     TOUCHSCREEN_MINX, TOUCHSCREEN_MAXX, 0, 0);
+     input_set_abs_params(input_dev, ABS_MT_POSITION_Y,
+                     TOUCHSCREEN_MINY, TOUCHSCREEN_MAXY, 0, 0);
+     input_set_abs_params(input_dev, ABS_MT_TOUCH_MAJOR,
+                     0, TOUCH_MAJOR_MAX, 0, 0);
+     input_set_abs_params(input_dev, ABS_MT_WIDTH_MAJOR,
+                     0, WIDTH_MAJOR_MAX, 0, 0);
+     input_set_abs_params(input_dev, ABS_MT_TRACKING_ID,
+                     0, TRACKING_ID_MAX, 0, 0);
+
+     ret = devm_request_threaded_irq(&client->dev,
+             client->irq,
+             NULL, pixcir_ts_irq_handler,
+             IRQF_ONESHOT | IRQF_TRIGGER_FALLING,
+             client->name, ts);
+     if (ret) {
+             dev_err(&client->dev, "\nFailed to register interrupt\n");
+             goto err_free_mem;
+     }
+
+     ts->input_dev = input_dev;
You need to make this assignment earlier, otherwise, if somebody is
touching the screen you'll get a nice oops here.
ok.
quoted
+     ret = input_register_device(ts->input_dev);
+     if (ret) {
+             dev_err(&client->dev, "Unable to register %s input device\n",
+                     input_dev->name);
+             goto err_free_mem;
+     }
+     device_init_wakeup(&client->dev, 1);
+
+     return 0;
+
+err_free_mem:
+     input_free_device(input_dev);
+     return ret;
+}
+
+static int pixcir_ts_remove(struct i2c_client *client)
+{
+     struct pixcir_ts_data *ts = i2c_get_clientdata(client);
+     device_init_wakeup(&client->dev, 0);
+     input_unregister_device(ts->input_dev);
This is so going to bomb because input device disappears but IRQ is not
going to be unregistered till later. The easiest way would be to use
devm_input_allocate_device() and get rid of input_unregister_device()
altogether.
ok.
quoted
+     return 0;
+}
+
+static const struct i2c_device_id pixcir_ts_id[] = {
+     { "tangoc-ts", 0 },
+     { }
+};
+
+MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(i2c, pixcir_ts_id);
+
+static struct i2c_driver pixcir_ts_driver = {
+     .driver = {
+             .name   = "tangoc-ts",
+             .owner  = THIS_MODULE,
+#ifdef CONFIG_PM_SLEEP
+             .pm     = &pixcir_dev_pm_ops,
+#endif
+     },
+     .id_table       = pixcir_ts_id,
+     .probe          = pixcir_ts_probe,
+     .remove         = pixcir_ts_remove,
+};
+
+module_i2c_driver(pixcir_ts_driver);
+
+MODULE_AUTHOR("Lisai Wang [off-list ref], Guoying Zhang [off-list ref]");
+MODULE_DESCRIPTION("PIXCIR-TangoC 5 points touch controller Driver");
+MODULE_LICENSE("GPL v2");
--
1.7.5.4
Thanks.

--
Dmitry
-barry
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help