Re: [PATCH] usb: USB host support should depend on HAS_DMA
From: Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu>
Date: 2013-08-19 15:09:35
Also in:
linux-media, lkml
On Sun, 18 Aug 2013, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
On Thu, Jul 11, 2013 at 1:12 AM, Arnd Bergmann [off-list ref] wrote:quoted
On Wednesday 10 July 2013, Alan Stern wrote:quoted
This isn't right. There are USB host controllers that use PIO, not DMA. The HAS_DMA dependency should go with the controller driver, not the USB core. On the other hand, the USB core does call various routines like dma_unmap_single. It ought to be possible to compile these calls even when DMA isn't enabled. That is, they should be defined as do-nothing stubs.The asm-generic/dma-mapping-broken.h file intentionally causes link errors, but that could be changed. The better approach in my mind would be to replace code like if (hcd->self.uses_dma) with if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_HAS_DMA) && hcd->self.uses_dma) { which will reliably cause that reference to be omitted from object code, but not stop giving link errors for drivers that actually require DMA.This can be done for drivers/usb/core/hcd.c. But I'm a bit puzzled by drivers/usb/core/buffer.c. E.g. void *hcd_buffer_alloc(...) { .... /* some USB hosts just use PIO */ if (!bus->controller->dma_mask && !(hcd->driver->flags & HCD_LOCAL_MEM)) {
I don't remember the full story. You should check with the person who added the HCD_LOCAL_MEM flag originally.
So if DMA is not used (!hcd->self.uses_dma, i.e. bus->controller->dma_mask is zero), and HCD_LOCAL_MEM is set, we still end up calling dma_pool_alloc()? (Naively, I'm not so familiar with the USB code) I'd expect it to use kmalloc() instead?
Maybe what happens in this case is that some sort of hook causes the allocation to be made from a special memory-mapped region on board the controller. Alan Stern