Thread (12 messages) 12 messages, 3 authors, 2013-08-16

Re: [PATCH 3/4] input: ti_tsc: Enable shared IRQ for TSC and add overrun, underflow checks

From: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <hidden>
Date: 2013-08-16 09:14:17
Also in: linux-iio, lkml

* Zubair Lutfullah | 2013-08-13 17:48:18 [+0100]:
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
Enable shared IRQ to allow ADC to share IRQ line from
parent MFD core. Only FIFO0 IRQs are for TSC and handled
on the TSC side.

Patch also adds overrun and underflow irq handlers.

Russ Dill (TI) worked on overrun and underflow handlers.
Rachna Patil (TI) laid ground work for shared IRQ.

Signed-off-by: Zubair Lutfullah <redacted>
---
drivers/input/touchscreen/ti_am335x_tsc.c |   37 +++++++++++++++++++++++++----
include/linux/mfd/ti_am335x_tscadc.h      |    2 ++
2 files changed, 34 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/input/touchscreen/ti_am335x_tsc.c b/drivers/input/touchscreen/ti_am335x_tsc.c
index 766bc7e..9c114b2 100644
--- a/drivers/input/touchscreen/ti_am335x_tsc.c
+++ b/drivers/input/touchscreen/ti_am335x_tsc.c
@@ -256,14 +256,39 @@ static irqreturn_t titsc_irq(int irq, void *dev)
{
	struct titsc *ts_dev = dev;
	struct input_dev *input_dev = ts_dev->input;
-	unsigned int status, irqclr = 0;
+	unsigned int status, irqclr = 0, config = 0;
	unsigned int x = 0, y = 0;
	unsigned int z1, z2, z;
	unsigned int fsm;

	status = titsc_readl(ts_dev, REG_IRQSTATUS);
-	if (status & IRQENB_FIFO0THRES) {
+	/*
+	 * ADC and touchscreen share the IRQ line.
+	 * FIFO1 threshold, FIFO1 Overrun and FIFO1 underflow
+	 * interrupts are used by ADC. Handle FIFO0 IRQs here only
+	 * and check if any IRQs left in case both fifos interrupt.
+	 * If any irq left, return none, else return handled.
+	 */
+	if ((status & IRQENB_FIFO0OVRRUN) ||
+			(status & IRQENB_FIFO0UNDRFLW)) {
+
+		config = titsc_readl(ts_dev, REG_CTRL);
+		config &= ~(CNTRLREG_TSCSSENB);
+		titsc_writel(ts_dev, REG_CTRL, config);
+
+		if (status & IRQENB_FIFO0UNDRFLW) {
+			titsc_writel(ts_dev, REG_IRQSTATUS,
+				(status | IRQENB_FIFO0UNDRFLW));
+			irqclr |= IRQENB_FIFO0UNDRFLW;
+		} else {
+			titsc_writel(ts_dev, REG_IRQSTATUS,
+				(status | IRQENB_FIFO0OVRRUN));
+			irqclr |= IRQENB_FIFO0OVRRUN;
+		}
You don't do anything on overflow / underflow. Is this due to the fact
once enabled for FIFO1 it also triggers for FIFO0?
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
+		titsc_writel(ts_dev, REG_CTRL,
+			(config | CNTRLREG_TSCSSENB));
+	} else if (status & IRQENB_FIFO0THRES) {
		titsc_read_coordinates(ts_dev, &x, &y, &z1, &z2);

		if (ts_dev->pen_down && z1 != 0 && z2 != 0) {
@@ -317,9 +342,11 @@ static irqreturn_t titsc_irq(int irq, void *dev)
	}

	if (irqclr) {
-		titsc_writel(ts_dev, REG_IRQSTATUS, irqclr);
+		titsc_writel(ts_dev, REG_IRQSTATUS, (status | irqclr));
Shouldn't FIFO1UNDRFLW & OVRRUN be handled by the adc driver? Why do you
or the unhandled bits as well here?
		am335x_tsc_se_set(ts_dev->mfd_tscadc, ts_dev->step_mask);
-		return IRQ_HANDLED;
+		status = titsc_readl(ts_dev, REG_IRQSTATUS);
+		if (status == false)
+			return IRQ_HANDLED;
And why this? If you something you handled it, if you didn't you return
NONE. Why does it depend on REG_IRQSTATUS?
	}
	return IRQ_NONE;
}
Sebastian
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help