Thread (14 messages) 14 messages, 5 authors, 2013-08-16

Re: [PATCH 1/3] HID: Use existing parser for pre-scanning the report descriptors

From: Alexander Holler <hidden>
Date: 2013-08-14 06:46:49
Also in: lkml

Am 13.08.2013 21:15, schrieb Benjamin Tissoires:
On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 8:37 PM, Alexander Holler [off-list ref] wrote:
quoted
Another problem is that I don't have any commercial sensor hub and I'm
therefor not a very relvant as tester (I've implemented the firmware for my
HID (sensor hub) device too). Therefor I've added Srinivas Pandruvada to cc,
because he's the only one I know who has HID sensor hubs.
It is not a problem if you don't have a commercial sensor hub :)
Thanks for adding Srinivas in CC.
The problem is that this invalidates me as a tester because everything I 
can test is something untested. As I've written both ends of the pipe, I 
could have understood something totally wrong but as I've implemented 
both sides (the device- and the kernel-part) it still might work without 
problems. Therefor I currently have to bother Srinivas whenever I do 
changes in the kernel in regard to hid-sensor-hub. ;)
quoted
And, as said, I've implemented the other side here too, therefor I've added
the descriptor I'm using below.
Thanks, this will help me to test against your report descriptors.
Can I also ask you to send me some hid-recorder[1] traces of your
sensor? With hid-replay, I can then re-inject them in the hid
subsystem, and then I include the results in a regression test suite.
Unfortunately hid-record doesn't list my device because it doesn't show 
up as an hidraw-device.

But maybe you have an Arduino Leonardo or a clone. If so you can get the 
description and firmware here:

http://ahsoftware.de/dcf77-hid-usb-rtc/

Regards,

Alexander Holler
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help