Re: [RFC 1/2] HID: Extend the interface with idle requests
From: Jiri Kosina <hidden>
Date: 2013-03-07 14:26:51
Also in:
lkml
On Wed, 27 Feb 2013, Benjamin Tissoires wrote:
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
Some drivers send the idle command directly to underlying device, creating an unwanted dependency on the underlying transport layer. This patch adds hid_hw_idle() to the interface, thereby removing usbhid from the lion share of the drivers. Signed-off-by: Benjamin Tissoires <redacted> --- drivers/hid/usbhid/hid-core.c | 15 +++++++++++++++ include/linux/hid.h | 19 +++++++++++++++++++ 2 files changed, 34 insertions(+)diff --git a/drivers/hid/usbhid/hid-core.c b/drivers/hid/usbhid/hid-core.c index 420466b..effcd3d 100644 --- a/drivers/hid/usbhid/hid-core.c +++ b/drivers/hid/usbhid/hid-core.c@@ -1253,6 +1253,20 @@ static void usbhid_request(struct hid_device *hid, struct hid_report *rep, int r } } +static int usbhid_idle(struct hid_device *hid, int report, int idle, + int reqtype)
Where does the need for passing the report argument come from please? -- Jiri Kosina SUSE Labs