On Mon, Feb 18, 2013 at 11:20:43PM -0800, Joe Perches wrote:

On Mon, 2013-02-18 at 20:13 -0800, Simon Glass wrote:

quoted

On Sat, Feb 16, 2013 at 12:49 PM, Dmitry Torokhov

quoted

On Fri, Feb 15, 2013 at 08:16:12PM -0800, Simon Glass wrote:

quoted

+     for (row = 0; row < ckdev->rows; row++) {
+             if (cros_ec_keyb_row_has_ghosting(ckdev, buf, row))
+                     return true;
+     }

No need for curly braces here. I would not care if not for below.

OK I dont't think I even knew about that rule. Actually, what is that rule?

There is no rule, uses with and without braces
exist in about similar numbers in the kernel.

Both are used ~2000 times.

Newer uses more commonly have braces and I think
using braces is a better style.

I consider this example of a single statement body (albeit nested) and
therefore no braces are necessary, as mentioned in out coding style.

Thanks.

-- 
Dmitry