On Mon, Feb 18, 2013 at 11:20:43PM -0800, Joe Perches wrote:
On Mon, 2013-02-18 at 20:13 -0800, Simon Glass wrote:
quoted
On Sat, Feb 16, 2013 at 12:49 PM, Dmitry Torokhov
quoted
On Fri, Feb 15, 2013 at 08:16:12PM -0800, Simon Glass wrote:
quoted
+ for (row = 0; row < ckdev->rows; row++) {
+ if (cros_ec_keyb_row_has_ghosting(ckdev, buf, row))
+ return true;
+ }
No need for curly braces here. I would not care if not for below.
OK I dont't think I even knew about that rule. Actually, what is that rule?
There is no rule, uses with and without braces
exist in about similar numbers in the kernel.
Both are used ~2000 times.
Newer uses more commonly have braces and I think
using braces is a better style.
I consider this example of a single statement body (albeit nested) and
therefore no braces are necessary, as mentioned in out coding style.
Thanks.
--
Dmitry