On Monday, October 29, 2012 10:32:54 PM Henrik Rydberg wrote:
quoted
quoted
Either way, the code looks functional to me.
So is that "reviewed-by"?
I was thinking about this hunk:
quoted
@@ -1972,7 +2084,20 @@ int input_register_device(struct input_dev *dev)
mutex_unlock(&input_mutex);
+ if (dev->devres_managed) {
+ dev_info(dev->dev.parent, "%s: registerign %s withdevres.\n", + __func__, dev->name ?: "N/A");
+ devres_add(dev->dev.parent, devres);
+ }
return 0;
+
+err_device_del:
+ device_del(&dev->dev);
+err_free_vals:
+ kfree(dev->vals);
Won't this yield a double free once we reach release()?
Nicely spotted, we need "dev->vals = NULL;" here.
--
Dmitry