Thread (8 messages) 8 messages, 2 authors, 2012-08-21

Re: [PATCH v3 3/3] input: rotary-encoder: add DT bindings

From: Daniel Mack <zonque@gmail.com>
Date: 2012-08-21 07:58:20

Dmitry,

can we merge this series? Your approach with a fix of that trivial
syntax error I pointed out above is fine for me.

Many thanks,
Daniel


On 31.07.2012 15:56, Daniel Mack wrote:
On 31.07.2012 08:12, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
quoted
Still, I do not line the copying of pdata over, maybe we coudl have
something like the patch below?
[...]
quoted
diff --git a/drivers/input/misc/rotary_encoder.c b/drivers/input/misc/rotary_encoder.c
index ea51265..0f9d746 100644
--- a/drivers/input/misc/rotary_encoder.c
+++ b/drivers/input/misc/rotary_encoder.c
@@ -24,6 +24,8 @@
 #include <linux/gpio.h>
 #include <linux/rotary_encoder.h>
 #include <linux/slab.h>
+#include <linux/of_platform.h>
+#include <linux/of_gpio.h>
 
 #define DRV_NAME "rotary-encoder"
 
@@ -140,6 +142,56 @@ static irqreturn_t rotary_encoder_half_period_irq(int irq, void *dev_id)
 	return IRQ_HANDLED;
 }
 
+#ifdef CONFIG_OF
+static struct of_device_id rotary_encoder_of_match[] = {
+	{ .compatible = "rotary-encoder", },
+	{ },
+};
+MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, rotary_encoder_of_match);
+
+static struct rotary_encoder_platform_data * __devinit
+rotary_encoder_parse_dt(struct device *dev)
+{
+	const struct of_device_id *of_id =
+				of_match_device(rotary_encoder_of_match, dev);
+	struct device_node *np = dev->of_node;
+	struct rotary_encoder_platform_data *pdata;
+	enum of_gpio_flags flags;
+
+	if (!of_id || !np)
+		return NULL;
+
+	pdata = kzalloc(sizeof(struct rotary_encoder_platform_data),
+			GFP_KERNEL);
+	if (!pdata)
+		return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
+
+	of_property_read_u32(np, "rotary-encoder,steps", &pdata->steps);
+	of_property_read_u32(np, "linux,axis", &pdata->axis);
+
+	pdata->gpio_a = of_get_gpio_flags(np, 0, &flags);
+	pdata->inverted_a = flags & OF_GPIO_ACTIVE_LOW;
+
+	pdata->gpio_b = of_get_gpio_flags(np, 1, &flags);
+	pdata->inverted_b = flags & OF_GPIO_ACTIVE_LOW;
+
+	pdata->relative_axis = !!of_get_property(np,
+					"rotary-encoder,relative-axis", NULL);
+	pdata->rollover = !!of_get_property(np,
+					"rotary-encoder,rollover", NULL);
+	pdata->half_period = !!of_get_property(np,
+					"rotary-encoder,half-period", NULL))
Syntax error.
quoted
+
+	return pdata;
+}
+#else
+static inline struct rotary_encoder_platform_data *
+rotary_encoder_parse_dt(struct device *dev)
+{
+	return NULL;
+}
+#endif
+
 static int __devinit rotary_encoder_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 {
 	struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
@@ -150,14 +202,19 @@ static int __devinit rotary_encoder_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 	int err;
 
 	if (!pdata) {
-		dev_err(&pdev->dev, "missing platform data\n");
-		return -ENOENT;
+		pdata = rotary_encoder_parse_dt(dev);
+		if (IS_ERR(pdata))
+			return PTR_ERR(pdata);
+
+		if (!pdata) {
+			dev_err(dev, "missing platform data\n");
+			return -EINVAL;
+		}
Well, then you would only parse DT parameters in case of no kernel
provided struct. I thought you were up to a solution where board file
data could override just parts of the DT provided information. But I
don't think the latter would be any useful anyway, so I'm happy with
your solution :)


Thanks for your help,
Daniel
  
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help