Re: [PATCH v3 3/3] input: rotary-encoder: add DT bindings
From: Daniel Mack <zonque@gmail.com>
Date: 2012-08-21 07:58:20
Dmitry, can we merge this series? Your approach with a fix of that trivial syntax error I pointed out above is fine for me. Many thanks, Daniel On 31.07.2012 15:56, Daniel Mack wrote:
On 31.07.2012 08:12, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:quoted
Still, I do not line the copying of pdata over, maybe we coudl have something like the patch below?[...]quoted
diff --git a/drivers/input/misc/rotary_encoder.c b/drivers/input/misc/rotary_encoder.c index ea51265..0f9d746 100644 --- a/drivers/input/misc/rotary_encoder.c +++ b/drivers/input/misc/rotary_encoder.c@@ -24,6 +24,8 @@ #include <linux/gpio.h> #include <linux/rotary_encoder.h> #include <linux/slab.h> +#include <linux/of_platform.h> +#include <linux/of_gpio.h> #define DRV_NAME "rotary-encoder"@@ -140,6 +142,56 @@ static irqreturn_t rotary_encoder_half_period_irq(int irq, void *dev_id) return IRQ_HANDLED; } +#ifdef CONFIG_OF +static struct of_device_id rotary_encoder_of_match[] = { + { .compatible = "rotary-encoder", }, + { }, +}; +MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, rotary_encoder_of_match); + +static struct rotary_encoder_platform_data * __devinit +rotary_encoder_parse_dt(struct device *dev) +{ + const struct of_device_id *of_id = + of_match_device(rotary_encoder_of_match, dev); + struct device_node *np = dev->of_node; + struct rotary_encoder_platform_data *pdata; + enum of_gpio_flags flags; + + if (!of_id || !np) + return NULL; + + pdata = kzalloc(sizeof(struct rotary_encoder_platform_data), + GFP_KERNEL); + if (!pdata) + return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM); + + of_property_read_u32(np, "rotary-encoder,steps", &pdata->steps); + of_property_read_u32(np, "linux,axis", &pdata->axis); + + pdata->gpio_a = of_get_gpio_flags(np, 0, &flags); + pdata->inverted_a = flags & OF_GPIO_ACTIVE_LOW; + + pdata->gpio_b = of_get_gpio_flags(np, 1, &flags); + pdata->inverted_b = flags & OF_GPIO_ACTIVE_LOW; + + pdata->relative_axis = !!of_get_property(np, + "rotary-encoder,relative-axis", NULL); + pdata->rollover = !!of_get_property(np, + "rotary-encoder,rollover", NULL); + pdata->half_period = !!of_get_property(np, + "rotary-encoder,half-period", NULL))Syntax error.quoted
+ + return pdata; +} +#else +static inline struct rotary_encoder_platform_data * +rotary_encoder_parse_dt(struct device *dev) +{ + return NULL; +} +#endif + static int __devinit rotary_encoder_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) { struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;@@ -150,14 +202,19 @@ static int __devinit rotary_encoder_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) int err; if (!pdata) { - dev_err(&pdev->dev, "missing platform data\n"); - return -ENOENT; + pdata = rotary_encoder_parse_dt(dev); + if (IS_ERR(pdata)) + return PTR_ERR(pdata); + + if (!pdata) { + dev_err(dev, "missing platform data\n"); + return -EINVAL; + }Well, then you would only parse DT parameters in case of no kernel provided struct. I thought you were up to a solution where board file data could override just parts of the DT provided information. But I don't think the latter would be any useful anyway, so I'm happy with your solution :) Thanks for your help, Daniel