Re: [PATCH] fixed coding style issues
flat view
From: Baodong Chen <hidden>
Date: 2012-07-25 07:44:06
Also in:
lkml
i want to participate in and to start from fixing simple issues! how could i choose issues form checkpatch's output to find which should be fixed which are not? or checkpatch.pl should be updated?? On Wed, Jul 25, 2012 at 3:30 PM, Joe Perches [off-list ref] wrote:
On Wed, 2012-07-25 at 15:11 +0800, Baodong Chen wrote:quoted
Fexed coding style issues from scripts/checkpatch.pl in drivers/inputNot all checkpatch messages need to be "fexed". :) Please use some taste and judgment before submitting patches based solely on checkpatch output.quoted
diff --git a/drivers/input/apm-power.c b/drivers/input/apm-power.c[]quoted
@@ -33,7 +33,7 @@ static void system_power_event(unsigned int keycode) } static void apmpower_event(struct input_handle *handle, unsigned inttype, - unsigned int code, int value) + unsigned int code, int value)Perhaps prefer alignment to immediately after open parenthesis.quoted
diff --git a/drivers/input/evdev.c b/drivers/input/evdev.c[]quoted
@@ -547,16 +547,44 @@ static int handle_eviocgbit(struct input_dev *dev, switch (type) { - case 0: bits = dev->evbit; len = EV_MAX; break;[]quoted
+ case 0: + bits = dev->evbit; + len = EV_MAX; + break;not all that better really.quoted
@@ -567,8 +595,8 @@ static int handle_eviocgbit(struct input_dev *dev, if (type == EV_KEY && size == OLD_KEY_MAX) { len = OLD_KEY_MAX; if (printk_timed_ratelimit(&keymax_warn_time, 10 * 1000)) - pr_warning("(EVIOCGBIT): Suspicious buffer size %u," - "limiting output to %zu bytes. See " + pr_warn("(EVIOCGBIT): Suspicious buffer size %u, " \ + "limiting output to %zu bytes. See " \The line continuations are also not necessary and I think are really ugly. Just coalesce the format.dead link I think.quoted
diff --git a/drivers/input/ff-core.c b/drivers/input/ff-core.c[]quoted
@@ -138,8 +138,8 @@ int input_ff_upload(struct input_dev *dev, structff_effect *effect, if (effect->id == -1) { for (id = 0; id < ff->max_effects; id++) - if (!ff->effect_owners[id]) - break; + if (!ff->effect_owners[id]) + break;Better surrounded by braces too. cheers, Joe