Re: [PATCH] i2c: Split I2C_M_NOSTART support out of I2C_FUNC_PROTOCOL_MANGLING

On Thu, 3 May 2012 10:58:15 +0100, Mark Brown wrote:

On Thu, May 03, 2012 at 11:52:11AM +0200, Wolfram Sang wrote:

quoted

Also, I'd think the FUNC_NOSTART bit should be 0x08 and SMBUS_PEC 0x4000. This
will be more intuitive, probably?

What is the value in renumbering everything?  It just seems like it
makes the diff less clear and has no practical value.

You actually just can't renumber them, as they are part of the ABI to
user-space (through i2c-dev's ioctl I2C_FUNCS.)

-- 
Jean Delvare