On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 10:22 PM, Oliver Neukum [off-list ref] wrote:
Am Dienstag, 24. April 2012, 06:19:00 schrieb Ming Lei:
quoted
@@ -486,11 +494,15 @@ static void hid_ctrl(struct urb *urb)
if (usbhid->ctrlhead != usbhid->ctrltail && !hid_submit_ctrl(hid)) {
/* Successfully submitted next urb in queue */
+ if (status != -ECONNRESET)
+ spin_unlock(&usbhid->unlink_lock);
spin_unlock(&usbhid->lock);
return;
}
clear_bit(HID_CTRL_RUNNING, &usbhid->iofl);
+ if (status != -ECONNRESET)
+ spin_unlock(&usbhid->unlink_lock);
spin_unlock(&usbhid->lock);
usb_autopm_put_interface_async(usbhid->intf);
wake_up(&usbhid->wait);
Now you race against a double time out
CPU A CPU B
__usbhid_submit_report()
time_after()
usb_unlink_urb()
-- this has to go to the hardware -->
hid_irq_out()
if (status != -ECONNRESET)
--> no lock
hid_submit_out()
__usbhid_submit_report()
time_after()
usb_submit_urb()
This submit won't happen because HID_OUT_RUNNING is not cleared.
usb_unlink_urb()
quoted
@@ -546,8 +558,13 @@ static void __usbhid_submit_report(struct
hid_device *hid, struct hid_report *re
* no race because this is called under
* spinlock
*/
- if (time_after(jiffies, usbhid->last_out + HZ * 5))
+ spin_lock(&usbhid->unlink_lock);
+ if (time_after(jiffies, usbhid->last_out + HZ * 5)) {
+ spin_unlock(&usbhid->lock);
usb_unlink_urb(usbhid->urbout);
+ spin_lock(&usbhid->lock);
+ }
+ spin_unlock(&usbhid->unlink_lock);
AB-BA deadlock
OK, if we always acquire unlink_lock before lock in usbhid_submit_report,
hid_led, hid_ctrl, and hid_irq_out, the AB-BA deadlock can be removed.
Thanks,
--
Ming Lei
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-input" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html