Thread (32 messages) 32 messages, 5 authors, 2012-04-19

Re: [PATCH v2 0/8] Second patchset for LPC32xx device tree conversion

From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Date: 2012-04-18 08:37:38
Also in: linux-arm-kernel, lkml

On Tuesday 17 April 2012, Dan Carpenter wrote:
On Tue, Apr 17, 2012 at 07:08:19PM +0200, Roland Stigge wrote:
quoted
Applies to v3.4-rc3
This probably applies fine (the previous version did a couple days
ago), but it's always best to submit patches against linux-next.
The 3.4 kernel is in -rc already so this is 3.5 material.
I disagree. The patches won't get applied on -next, they get applied
on an -rc release, so they should be submitted against that version
as well. I agree that it makes sense to test patches against -next
when there is reason to believe there might be conflicts, but it's
not mandatory. When you know about conflicts against other patches
that are already in -next, I suggest listing them in the cover 
letter (the patch 0/x) and suggest a resolution.

	Arnd
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help