Re: [PATCH v2 0/8] Second patchset for LPC32xx device tree conversion
From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Date: 2012-04-18 08:37:38
Also in:
linux-arm-kernel, lkml
From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Date: 2012-04-18 08:37:38
Also in:
linux-arm-kernel, lkml
On Tuesday 17 April 2012, Dan Carpenter wrote:
On Tue, Apr 17, 2012 at 07:08:19PM +0200, Roland Stigge wrote:quoted
Applies to v3.4-rc3This probably applies fine (the previous version did a couple days ago), but it's always best to submit patches against linux-next. The 3.4 kernel is in -rc already so this is 3.5 material.
I disagree. The patches won't get applied on -next, they get applied on an -rc release, so they should be submitted against that version as well. I agree that it makes sense to test patches against -next when there is reason to believe there might be conflicts, but it's not mandatory. When you know about conflicts against other patches that are already in -next, I suggest listing them in the cover letter (the patch 0/x) and suggest a resolution. Arnd