On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 05:31:24PM +0900, Chanwoo Choi wrote:

Hi Dmitry,

On 03/07/2012 05:29 PM, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:

quoted

Hi Chanwoo,


On Wed, Mar 07, 2012 at 05:02:49PM +0900, Chanwoo Choi wrote:

quoted

MAX8997 has several features in a single chip,
This patchset supports unimplemented haptic driver of MAX8997.

v2
- code clean and remove unnecessary code according to comment of Dmitry
Torokhov

Could you please tell me if the version of the patch I sent to you
worked or not?

It isn't worked because it use the mutex lock in irq handler stack.
so, I resend v3 patch of max8997-haptic driver after modifying it.

Hmm, my patch did not add taking mutex in irq context, I presume you are
talking about max8997->iolock that is taken in max8997_write_reg... OK,
I see...

-- 
Dmitry