Hi Daniel,

quoted

So if num_fingers == 2 and only one of a and b returns
finger_touched() == true, we fall back to zero fingers?

Actually, yes.   In this case, we will have 2 x's and 2 y's, but not
know which belong to a good finger and which belong to a too light
finger....  sigh... synaptics... sigh...

I see the problem. However, ignoring it will just move the problem
forward to another bug report, will it not?  Hysteresis is a slam dunk
here.  In addition, since the low-pressure state is bound to be
transitional (soon to be followed by a real num_fingers==1 package),
simply skipping such packages might be a better option.

quoted

Why not introduce hysteresis for all fingers here? There is an example
implementation in bcm5974.c in the same directory.

Good idea, can it be in a different, follow-up patch?

Why should it be?

Thanks,
Henrik