Re: Re: [PATCH v2 2/6] MFD: twl6040: Cache the vibra control registers

On Tuesday 11 October 2011 09:01:42 Dmitry Torokhov wrote:

I'm OK with all patches going through MFD - I do not believe it will
cause any merge issues.

Thanks Dmitry.

For the record I still do not like returning EBUSY when device is not
available - I think if device can't serve any requests it should not
exists at all.

While I tend to agree with this, in embedded systems this might (not 
certainly) cause issues. Embedded SW (middleware, high level) tends to take 
the underlaying HW as static.
Before I can do the dynamic input device creation/destruction I need to make 
sure that the userspace is ready for this.
I'm planning to address your concern regarding to twl6040, and at the same 
time I'm going to change the twl4030 vibra/MFD/audio driver to behave in a 
same way.

--
Péter
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-input" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html