Re: [Q] max11801 licensing terms
From: Jiejing.Zhang <hidden>
Date: 2011-08-18 10:27:30
Hi Dmitry, I've send a patch to mail list. Thanks. Best regards, Zhang Jiejing 2011/8/18 Dmitry Torokhov [off-list ref]:
On Wed, Aug 17, 2011 at 09:24:32PM +0800, Jiejing.Zhang wrote:quoted
Hi Brian Foster,quoted
* Based on mcs5000_ts.cI have referenced mcs5000_ts.c source code when writing this driver, but I don't think it's a big deal, I really reference lots of files.quoted
What does “either version 2 of the License.” mean? Either GPLv2 or what?Yes, I think it means GPLv2, I'm not really not very care about these license, just copy other files under driver/input/ directory.mcs5000_ts.c (and m97xx-core.c it was derived from) are GPLv2 or later so max11801_ts.c shoudl folow the same licensing terms, but it seems the statement was truncated. Jiejing, could you please send me a patch restoring the proper wording so there won't be any confusion in the future? Thanks! -- Dmitry
-- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-input" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html