Re: [rtc-linux] Re: [PATCH 2/3] input: pmic8xxx_pwrkey: Add support for power key
From: Anirudh Ghayal <hidden>
Date: 2011-04-01 09:23:26
Also in:
linux-arm-msm, lkml
Hi Stephen, Thanks for reviewing. I will submit a V2 patch with the changes. On 3/29/2011 2:27 AM, Stephen Boyd wrote:
On 3/26/2011 9:52 AM, Anirudh Ghayal wrote:quoted
+static void pmic8xxx_pwrkey_timer(unsigned long handle) +{ + unsigned long flags; + struct pmic8xxx_pwrkey *pwrkey = (struct pmic8xxx_pwrkey *)handle; + + spin_lock_irqsave(&pwrkey->lock, flags); + pwrkey->key_pressed = true; + + input_report_key(pwrkey->pwr, KEY_POWER, 1); + input_sync(pwrkey->pwr); + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&pwrkey->lock, flags); +} +[snip]quoted
+ +static irqreturn_t pwrkey_release_irq(int irq, void *_pwrkey) +{ + struct pmic8xxx_pwrkey *pwrkey = _pwrkey; + unsigned long flags; + + /* no pwrkey time, means no delay in pwr key reporting */ + if (!pwrkey->pdata->pwrkey_time_ms) { + input_report_key(pwrkey->pwr, KEY_POWER, 0); + input_sync(pwrkey->pwr); + return IRQ_HANDLED; + } + + spin_lock_irqsave(&pwrkey->lock, flags); + del_timer_sync(&pwrkey->timer);Can you call del_timer_sync() while holding the lock that your timer function also acquires? I thought lockdep would have complained loudly about that but I'm not sure. It looks like a deadlock scenario.
Right. I will move del_timer_sync outside the spinlock.
quoted
+static int __devinit pmic8xxx_pwrkey_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) +{[snip]quoted
+ + if (pdata->kpd_trigger_delay_us> 62500) { + dev_err(&pdev->dev, "invalid pwr key trigger delay\n");Nitpick: Can you spell out "power" here instead of pwr? Or use "kpd_trigger_delay_us" instead.
Ok.
quoted
+ return -EINVAL; + } + + if (pdata->pwrkey_time_ms&& + (pdata->pwrkey_time_ms< 500 || pdata->pwrkey_time_ms> 1000)) { + dev_err(&pdev->dev, "invalid pwr key time supplied\n");
Ok.
Dittoquoted
+ + pon_cntl&= ~PON_CNTL_TRIG_DELAY_MASK; + pon_cntl |= (delay& PON_CNTL_TRIG_DELAY_MASK); + pon_cntl |= (pdata->pull_up ? PON_CNTL_PULL_UP : ~PON_CNTL_PULL_UP);Did you just set a bunch of bits you didn't want to when pdata->pull_up == false?
Oops right. I will fix this.
Thank you, ~Anirudh -- Sent by a consultant of the Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum.