Thread (10 messages) 10 messages, 4 authors, 2011-03-25

Re: [PATCH v3] Documentation: Add evdev type and code definitions

flat view

From: Chris Bagwell <hidden>
Date: 2011-03-24 20:28:33
Also in: lkml

On Thu, Mar 24, 2011 at 2:45 PM, Chase Douglas
[off-list ref] wrote:
On 03/24/2011 02:44 PM, Chris Bagwell wrote:
quoted
Looking good.  Minor comments at end.

On Thu, Mar 24, 2011 at 12:44 PM, Chase Douglas
[off-list ref] wrote:
quoted
+Touchscreens:
+----------
+ABS_{X,Y} must be reported with the location of the touch. BTN_TOUCH must be
+used to report when a touch is active on the screen.
+BTN_{MOUSE,LEFT,MIDDLE,RIGHT} must not be reported. BTN_TOOL_<name> events
+should be reported where possible.
Does the real button event restriction solve something?  I know
majority of touchscreens are not sending a button today but usually
there is a button on the touchscreen frame that I'd image at least
some devices hooking it up to touchscreen interface.

stylus+touchscreen combo devices are surely going to want to do this.
Perhaps this should be more clearly for touchscreen-only devices (not
tablets or a mix). The problem we end up seeing is drivers who use
BTN_LEFT because they want a touch to generate a primary button press in
X. I want to prevent people from doing this.
Oh, yes.  We do not want that for sure.  I thought you were talking
about "real" buttons and not something from a touch.  I would have
gotten it on first read if it said "BTN_* must not be reported as a
result of active touch."
I believe mixed devices are hard to detect between tablets and
stylus+touchscreen right now, as evidenced by the X evdev driver not
handling the former by default while wacom is often used for the latter.
However, with the device properties a userspace driver should be able to
tell the two apart.

I'll rename this guideline: Touchscreens without stylus tools. Any issues?
I think either original name or new name is fine.  The above intent
doesn't change even on combo devices.
quoted
quoted
+
+Trackpads:
+----------
+Legacy trackpads that only provide relative position information must report
+events like mice described above.
+
+Trackpads that provide absolute touch position must report ABS_{X,Y} for the
+location of the touch. BTN_TOUCH should be used to report when a touch is active
+on the trackpad. Where multi-finger support is available, BTN_TOOL_<name> should
+be used to report the number of touches active on the trackpad.
How about a Tablet?

Something like:

Tablets:
--------

BTN_TOOL_<name> events must be reported when a stylus or other tool is
active on tablet.  ABS_{X,Y} must be reported with the location of the
tool. BTN_TOUCH should be used to report when the tool is in contact
with the tablet. BTN_{STYLUS,STLUS2} should be used to report buttons
on tool itself and BTN_{LEFT,MIDDLE,RIGHT,1,2,etc} should be used to
report buttons on tablet.
Thanks for the addition! I'll add it in and add you on a SOB line if
that's alright with you.
Sure thing.

Chris
quoted
Some tablets send ABS_PRESSURE with no BTN_TOUCH (why I said should
instead of must).  Probably this is not worth mentioning here?
Yeah, I'd leave that off as I think we want to set the guidelines to use
BTN_TOUCH.

Thanks,

-- Chase
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-input" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help