On Fri, Feb 04, 2011 at 09:15:19AM -0800, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
On Fri, Feb 04, 2011 at 12:23:14PM +0100, Henrik Rydberg wrote:
quoted
quoted
Henrik> The code below will return -EINVAL even if some parts of the buffer
Henrik> was successfully read, though.
You mean written? I don't see that. The only place we return -EINVAL is
at the initial check.
Right, it should have been written, and -EFAULT, referring to the code
in the loop.
If we faulted somewhere midway the only sane thing it to treat the whole
request as suspect and return -EFAULT. We really do not know what
happened to the other data (it could have gone past the buffer user
intended but haven't triggered the fault yet. We can't fully recover
either since we aleady retrievend the event that caused fault.
Alright. I think all ambiguities have now been exhausted, so ACK from
me as well. :-)
Thanks,
Henrik