Thread (22 messages) 22 messages, 7 authors, 2011-02-06

Re: [PATCH v3 2/2] Input: ads7846: use gpio_request_one to configure pendown_gpio

STALE5719d

From: Igor Grinberg <hidden>
Date: 2011-02-04 14:47:09
Also in: linux-arm-kernel, linux-omap


On 02/04/11 16:16, G, Manjunath Kondaiah wrote:
On Fri, Feb 04, 2011 at 03:08:47PM +0100, Wolfram Sang wrote:
quoted
On Fri, Feb 04, 2011 at 07:02:50PM +0530, G, Manjunath Kondaiah wrote:
quoted
On Thu, Feb 03, 2011 at 09:19:53AM -0800, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
quoted
On Thu, Feb 03, 2011 at 08:54:05AM -0800, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
quoted
On Thu, Feb 03, 2011 at 08:51:46PM +0530, Sourav Poddar wrote:
quoted
The ads7846 driver requests a gpio but does not currently
configure it explicitly as an input. Use gpio_request_one
to request and configure it at one shot.

Signed-off-by: Sourav Poddar <redacted>
Cc: Dmitry Torokhov <redacted>
Will apply this one, the other one is a bit messy IMO, will have to
think about it.
Something like below should do I think.
Patch looks good but it applies only on top of previous patch:
https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/529941/

Why to have two patches for this fix?
http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-omap/msg45167.html
My point here is: 
1. The first patch only replaces gpio_request with gpio_request_one
2. Rest of the things are handled in 2nd patch posted by dmitry

What is harm in merging both the patches? I don't think it affects
readability.
Because the changes introduced by the patches are from different nature.
As stated in the link above, one is a functional change (gpio setup change)
and second is fixing the imbalance in request - free calls.
The impact is not readability, but bad bisect-ability.


-- 
Regards,
Igor.
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help