Re: [PATCH v2] altera_ps2: Add devicetree support
From: Grant Likely <hidden>
Date: 2011-02-02 15:38:10
Also in:
linux-devicetree, lkml
From: Grant Likely <hidden>
Date: 2011-02-02 15:38:10
Also in:
linux-devicetree, lkml
On Wed, Feb 02, 2011 at 07:48:58PM +0800, Thomas Chou wrote:
On 02/02/2011 12:31 PM, Grant Likely wrote:quoted
quoted
+static const struct of_device_id altera_ps2_match[] = { + { .compatible = "altr,ps2-1.0", },I thought I had seen 'altera' instead of an abbreviation being used in a previous patch. I don't care much whether 'altr' or 'altera' is used, but I'd like to know that there is consensus from the Altera users so that all the drivers use the same prefix.We had discussed on nios2-dev mailing list, and decided to use 'altr' as Walter suggested that it saves space. About the documentation on dts binding, shall we have a single altera.txt to describe all Altera related binding, and opencores.txt to describe all OpenCores binding? Or separate file for each core in its driver class?
Since I'm reorganizing the binding documentation to reflect subsystems (bindings/spi, bindings/i2c, bindings/powerpc, etc) I'd prefer to see a separate file for each type of core. Eventually, I'd like to define a record format for documenting bindings that can generate searchable and crosslinked output, but I've not spent any time looking at that seriously yet. g.
- Thomas