(off-list ancestor, not in this archive)
[PATCH 10/32] input/tps6507x-ts: use system_wq instead of dedicated workqueue · Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> · 2011-01-03
Re: [PATCH 10/32] input/tps6507x-ts: use system_wq instead of dedicated workqueue · Dan Carpenter <hidden> · 2011-01-03
Re: [PATCH 10/32] input/tps6507x-ts: use system_wq instead of dedicated workqueue · Todd Fischer <hidden> · 2011-01-03
Re: [PATCH 10/32] input/tps6507x-ts: use system_wq instead of dedicated workqueue · Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> · 2011-01-25
Re: [PATCH 10/32] input/tps6507x-ts: use system_wq instead of dedicated workqueue · Todd Fischer <hidden> · 2011-01-25
Re: [PATCH 10/32] input/tps6507x-ts: use system_wq instead of dedicated workqueue · Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com> · 2011-01-25
Re: [PATCH 10/32] input/tps6507x-ts: use system_wq instead of dedicated workqueue · Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> · 2011-01-26

Re: [PATCH 10/32] input/tps6507x-ts: use system_wq instead of dedicated workqueue

From: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Date: 2011-01-26 10:43:09
Also in: lkml

On Tue, Jan 25, 2011 at 08:50:06AM -0800, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:

On Tue, Jan 25, 2011 at 09:13:45AM -0700, Todd Fischer wrote:

quoted

On 01/25/2011 07:19 AM, Tejun Heo wrote:

quoted

Shall I apply the patch?
Thanks

Yes, apply the patch.  I am not sure of the syntax for attaching my
sign off.  Hope this is okay.

Todd

Signed-off-by: Todd Fischer<redacted>

That should be Acked-by since you are not passing the patch along.

Added ack-by's of Todd and you.  Thank you.

-- 
tejun