Thread (4 messages) flat view 4 messages, 3 authors, 2011-01-24

Re: [PATCH 1/1] Input: sysrq -- ensure sysrq_enabled and __sysrq_enabled are consistent

From: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>
Date: 2011-01-24 17:05:09
Also in: lkml

On Mon, Jan 24, 2011 at 02:06:12PM +0000, Andy Whitcroft wrote:
Currently sysrq_enabled and __sysrq_enabled are initialised separatly
and inconsitantly, leading to sysrq being actually enabled by reported
as not enabled in sysfs.  The first change to the sysfs configurable
synchronises these two:

    static int __read_mostly sysrq_enabled = 1;
    static int __sysrq_enabled;

Add a common define to carry the default for these preventing them becoming
out of sync again.  Default this to 1 to mirror previous behaviour.

Signed-off-by: Andy Whitcroft <apw@canonical.com>
Applied and will also tag for stable. Thank you Andy.

-- 
Dmitry
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help